
This person seems questionably literate at best.
This person seems questionably literate at best.
Nah, it’s just straight up a popular opinion that boils down to an insult. Seems to be two things not allowed on unpopular opinions.
Definitely not just outside.
Moose. Moose win.
Naphtha and benzene are actually different chemicals, though…
Yea yea I know they’re all hydrocarbons but it’s still funny.
I mean, just because it’s not for “all ages” shouldn’t imply NSFW… This is like PG area, maybe PG13 if you’re a prude, neither of which are “all ages”.
Well he clearly gives a shit about taking a shit.
Acceptable quality is a bit of a stretch in many cases… Especially with the hallucinations everywhere in generated text.
No, it’s worth blanket hating because most all of the commercial “AI”:
I am amazed people are still this misinformed about why people dislike AI…
Hopefully they used a slightly different literal design, because the WTC had serious design flaws that allowed it to fall as it did.
Basically, it’s columns along the outside held together only by the floors’ structure themselves. So when a plane took out a bunch of floors and the fire weakened more, there was suddenly an entire middle section that didn’t have any lateral support. This allowed the colimns along those sections to accordion in/out to begin the fall. Since buildings aren’t made to have dynamic forces of the scale of the entire freaking building’s weight, that made even the structurally sound sections fail on impact as the upper floors came down ontop of them, etc.
There were also compounding construction issues, as the fire resistant coating was supposed to be sprayed directly on to the steel floor beams up to a minimum depth, but investigations even before the collapse showed the builders were lazy fucks and just sprayed large sections from one vantage point, leaving some areas thinner or not covered at all.
If they used a similar design, something as simple as a typical fire could cause the whole thing to collapse.
We are not planning to offer things like ID checks or facial recognition because these require us to pay a third party to confirm each person.
Ohh so close.
Just like any good joke, someone’s going to take it too literal. Sigma has been around so long that it’s heavily in the category of, “satire that some didn’t realize was satire and now it’s unironically used”.
Yes, for the sake of the meme, they used Bateman as an inflammatory example, on purpose, to trigger people sensitive to the topic. This MO has been around for decades, and you fell for it like it’s your first time on the internet.
Yes, and every single person who calls for a genocide is wrong. That should be utterly clear by now.
What I mean when I say, “so they cannot be judged?” is to say ruling by numbers is utterly stupid. There is no quantity of people so great that they cannot be INDIVIDUALLY judged. If you liken judging hateful bigots who ARE committing a genocide as equal to a genocide of its own, then you are simply too stupid to understand this entire conversation…
Is EVERYONE saying, “Nazis are bad” also asking for a “big bad genocide”? Or are they stating a fact of relaity that some ideologies are so gross that they do not deserve to be espoused without serious consequence? Seriously, your insistence on being ignorant to this makes me wonder where your morals actually lay… You are clearly espousing more zionism than “genocides are bad”…
You are using one person to judge every single lonely male. Congratulations on further proving your utter inability to think beyond steroetypes. Your mind is truly a vapid space of generalities and presumptions. Just stop commenting on this topic for your own good because you are just constantly proving the sheer depths of your ignorant judgement.
How are you this confused over two sentences? You are seriously braindead…
English isn’t programming that’s why PHRASING is important. If you cannot understand that basic, utterly foundational tenant of communication, then there truly is no hope for you.
Nobody should be required to understand what is meant by a poorly phrased sentiment. Good communication is about what messages can be received, not about what was intended. It’s exactly why professional writers say to avoid idioms. It doesn’t matter what is meant. It matters what can be received.
It is wholly on you if you continue to fail to understand this utterly basic lesson of clear communication. One more time just to be clear: I am not against the sentiment of what was said. I am against phrasing it in such flippantly silly ways.
I don’t care who others date. I do care about people spreading racist hate. Your bigotry is not appreciated and it’s hilarious that you claim to be against racism while espousing such bigotry. Genuinely, you are pathetically not self-aware.
There are literally hundreds of posts already made right here on this post explaining things further. So again, if you cannot understand the implications of me saying, “there are more than two emotions”, then perhaps you are simply too immature to understand it in the first place.
For your own good, grow up and learn what the word “nuance” means.
Ahh, moving on to strawmanning? I’m starting to understand why others have claimed you’re bad, because you are hilariously immature for how much you know of history…
He knew what he was doing and he knew conservatives are too fucking dumb to realize what the natural result would be. It’s kinda’ one of the things they’re known for.