American Eagle is in full-on crisis mode after their “Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans” campaign was met by swift public backlash as critics accused the ad of invoking eugenics. Today, the clothing company finally put out a statement explaining the campaign’s original aim: American Eagle is clarifying that their Sydney Sweeney ad was only intended to make people masturbate. […]
It wasn’t even a “nod to horrific shit” though. It was just a pun about Sydney Sweeney having “good jeans”. Honestly, it’s so bizarre that people would jump to eugenics over it. Would that have been their reaction if they had used a Japanese model with the exact same measurements? The pun would still be valid, but I doubt anyone would be outraged.
Nazis these days don’t even gotta dogwhistle anymore: they can blast the foghorn and even still the most wilfully obtuse motherfuckers lacking a high-school level of media literacy (that’s you) will be out here running defence for them. Shut the fuck your mouth
Lol! You guys are hilarious.
Your interpretation is absolutely not a nod to anything negative. The point I was driving at is that it’s very possible that people fully understood that pun and believed that wasn’t the only message being delivered. It absolutely was nod to horrific shit if there really was an intended extra undertone of, the blond haired blue eyed white woman has good genes. I am not arguing it’s intentional, but I can see how some would look at that sideways.
Being ambiguous is kind of how dog whistles work and I can see why people would be on edge in current America about that specific flavor of whistle. I’m personally more concerned with the open rooftop screaming though.
It was only a nod in the brains of people looking for shit.
The “good jeans” joke has been a thing for numerous decades.
You’re only reading into it because you want to be offended.
I feel like you have misunderstood what I said quite severely if this was your takeaway about me.
Whether or not they intended it, it’s pretty tone deaf right now to release an ad with a blonde haired, blue eyed person saying they have “great genes” because of her blue eyes with the word “genes” literally on the screen but crossed out to make the jeans pun. It’s a bad look.
If they used a model of any other ethnicity…would that be just as bad? If all this outrage is solely based on her being white, then that’s pretty fucked up. You guys need to check your own biases, here.
Why didn’t they use more than one model though? Multiple ethnicities? “I have great genes/jeans,” layered over pictures of models of every race, weight, disability, background, etc. Could’ve advertised multiple styles and colors of jeans, ripped jeans, etc.
Why did they only pick her, who is from racist Spokane and whose dad is a Trumper? Why is it specifically “Sydney Sweeney has great genes,” and not “Americans have great genes”? It’s American Eagle, right?
Eta: the CEO of American Eagle is also a Trump supporter, and his son is selling a Florida house for the Trumps
And none of this is to mention that she seems to have extra genes via mosaic Down Syndrome, causing her facial features and large tongue/speaking issues, as well as her biddable temperament to do whatever fascists want without giving it a second thought. She is likely being taken advantage of even more than most actresses her age are, which is a lot.
Below - currenr pic of Sydney, pic of girl w mosaic down syndrome, pic of Sydmey before plastic surgery/injectables, pic of descriptive features of down syndrome:
Eta: Relevant link, she is like the Down Syndrome Clayton Bigsby and that’s exactly how I feel watching her spout off Nazi shit https://youtu.be/BLNDqxrUUwQ
Look, I agree with the first half, but wtf is the point of speculating if she has down syndrome? It’s rude at best, ableist at worst. Don’t do that.
It is not ableist and it is highly relevant when discussing this.
So, you’re an abelist now, too? Wow. Keep digging…let’s see how far down the bigoted rabbit-hole you’ll go to prove everyone else is a bigot. Please, go on.
What is ableist about what I said, exactly?
I think it’s more that you’re mad you jerked it to a girl with down syndrome being taken advantage of by fascists and media
Man, if you don’t even have the self-awareness to see what you just wrote, then there is no point in talking to you.
No, it’s rather that YOU are ableist against people with down syndrome and projected that onto my words. Now when asked what exactly is ableist, you can’t say - because it was you projecting.
Still can’t hear yourself, right now…can you?
No, it’s not based on her being just white. It’s like you decided to ignore almost everything I said. There’s some important historical context about white, blond, blue-eyed people saying they have superior genes.
So, it is about her being white…and the additional context you are reading into it, because she’s white.
If they did, isn’t what they did