Pharma manufacturer Gilead making available at cost (2 million doses in most needed countries) while generics are developed and can later be distributed. Decent play from a Pharma company.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Twice a year injectables are very scary to me because an adverse reaction is something may last more than half a year. You could be in for a bad time.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Great! Now we preferably need something that we don’t need to use twice a year, and we could actually vaccinate everyone.

    Because realistically, most people will not take a vaccine twice a year just in case.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Gay men are at a much higher risk for HIV so they may take it twice a year.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Around the world, MSM (men who have sex with men - not necessarily gay) are 25 times more likely than average to contract HIV, reports UNAIDS. (healthline).

      Among MSM, Black and Hispanic men are at higher risk than white men of contracting the virus, reports the CDC.

      This may be because, according to a 2017 source, Black and Hispanic men are less likely to take preventive medication. The reasons for this include the stigma surrounding same-sex experiences and enduring racism, discrimination, and racist systems.

      Also, HIV also tends to affect people in under-resourced communities with less access to preventive HIV care.

      Physical factors include the protective lining of the anus being thinner than the wall of the vagina, increasing the risk of transmission.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thanks for additional info! For particularly endangered groups, this may make all the sense to take it, then.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This would be a whole lot more uplifting without the news about getting rid of the woke preventative medicine panel.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As am I, but don’t stop counting yet. I’m sure this administration will guarantee many more are lost.

  • pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s so nice to have these vaccines to protect us and allow us to live a fuller life…. I wonder what republicans are gonna do about it?… or is Kennedy gonna stop it from hitting shelves?

    • paranoia@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Just want to be clear to anyone reading that this is not an HIV vaccine, it’s a long-lasting antiviral medication. Similar therapies have been approved since 2012, and an injection that lasts for two months was approved in 2021.

      The main benefit of a once-every-six-month injection is for people at high risk with very limited access to healthcare. PrEP is great but this is a fairly minor improvement to existing therapies.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ve seen the word vaccine appear at least 5 times in this thread. It’s weird that people are going there.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Go look up side effects of medications. Even if controlled, your kidneys and liver are in for a bad time.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        True, although the treatment also got a long way with people living hood lifes for many decades after initial diagnosis now. Also I heard they had some success actually curing HIV in a lab environment using some kind of modified retrovirus. That will most like still take till the 30’s before it becomes available though.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Uh, a vaccine is a preventative, not a cure. That idea is contained in the definition of “vaccine”.

        • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Sometimes “passive vaccine” is used to describe an injection of antibodies to directly fight an ongoing disease.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        i read the article and they also mentioned that they already got it approved for patients already infected with HIV back in 2022. idk about its effectiveness though

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              The numbers are more complicated then that. PIV sex you are less likely to transfer HIV then anal. Which is why gay men are effected by the disease more.

            • Ragnor@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              It depends on what percentage of the population has HIV or aids in your community. It usually isn’t that high, depending on where you are. Even if some of them had HIV / aids and you were completely unprotected, the risk of getting the disease isn’t 100%.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      its been survival with proper treatment, no longer getting AIDS. of course there are people that still engage in risky behavior, and 1 person made news with untreated HIV a tapeworm gave him cancer, the tapeworm got cancer and gave the guy with hiv tapeworm cancer, which is unheard of.

  • FarraigePlaisteaċ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Peter Marks was forced out of the FDA by Trump, in part for refusing to spread disinformation about vaccines. I didn’t think we’d be able to believe anything they say for the next few years.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    This was apparently on June 18. Here’s NBC’s coverage of it: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-hiv-prevention-drug-prep-lenacapavir-rcna208387

    I’m trying to find other outlets that confirm “The makers are also providing affordable access to the drug in the US and beyond, signing royalty-free licensing agreements with six generic manufacturers to produce and supply it.”, which NBC’s article doesn’t say.

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh that’s cool! If you find the source please do share (or post it again! This is good news).

  • womjunru@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah but Trump pulling funding means people who need it can’t afford it. I guess if a person has HIV and voted for Trump… they wanted that? Weird.