The petition to reverse Brexit got something like 4 million signatures. Response: LOL No.

Brexit it’s referendum because the Tories were scared of loosing power to Frog Face Faeage’s party. So they did a bit of appeasement.

I hear their love can be bone shattering.

(honestly I think whoever was rolling the dice for Toc just kept getting 1s)

Or the original name for Microsoft One Drive

Strange, it’s one of the larger pixelfed instances.

Can you get to just my profile? https://pixelfed.social/struds

Is why we need a

LIB.

DEM.

SURGE

So you’re pro climate change, pro dismantling the nhs, pro tax cuts for the rich and rises for the poor.

Got it.

They need to do something to improve their communication. But this. Really?

As I understand it if a site doesn’t comply and fineing them isn’t an option Ofcom can apply for a court order to, indeed, compell ISPs to block them.

Then it just gets blocked in the uk and you’re back to having to use a vpn.

That wouldn’t solve anything

This was my wife’s immediate comment when I showed her this

how much effort they put on showing the world the consequences of extremely stupid acts so the rest don’t have to do it.

Kinda sucks to be the world’s policy alpha tester though.

You think given how well thought through this online safety act has been that they’ll understand that would be an issue and legislate accordingly?

How many small businesses can afford such permit? Hell, I’d argue that even bigger companies will have a problem paying for that.

Feature, not a bug.

They want people back in offices to help landlords and property prices. This way they can say that remote work is not banned and it’s just companies choosing not to buy a permit and offer it.

Oh that makes it easier for the government.

Maybe that the end goal, force people back into the office by banning vpn

Ban remote working, vpn now only allowed from business addresses as registered with companies house.

Next step: ban on remote work.

What I don’t get is why it’s ok to view that at 18 but not at 17 years and 364 days. Surely just ban the site for everyone.

For example, the Government is very concerned about small platforms that host harmful content, such as forums dedicated to encouraging suicide or self-harm.

So they’ve identified a problem with this type of content, and the answer is to put it behind an age wall. So is it a-ok for anyone over 18 to be encouraged to self harm or commit suicide according to the government?