It’s another story if you consider that every day is 100 hours

So you got up and immediately went to do it?

Only in Christmas Land

Well, you can count France as not part of most of Europe in that regard, only the areas that were German between 1871 and 1918 have them as public holidays

J’ai toujours vu ça comme une conversation du style : “- Did you see <random news article>?” “- i already read it”

Just imagine your mom saying your full name with an audible full stop, right after you said/did something a bit dumb

It’s entirely unreasonable to compromise on striking rights for the mere convenience of international travellers and the pockets of airline owners. I don’t see how forcing people to work could be apolitical.

Yep pretty much

I do not see how that’s opposed to personal choice, one’s liberty to smoke stops where another person’s liberty to not deal with the smell and refuse begins

The (local) universe

He’s certainly a SpaceX fan, which I think is a lot more defensible than being a Musk fan

Being unable to comply (signal) and selectively refusing to comply while still having access to the data (telegram) is not equivalent

Basically yeah, it’s a text editor with a lot of features geared towards making programing easier, e.g. an equivalent of a spell checker but for code. Like any software, some IDEs/features can be either poorly designed or unstable, which can be aggravating when you spend your day working with it.

The result of the symptoms could be struggling in school, but it doesn’t have to be is my understanding

It’s really good, I played it again recently after not touching it for maybe 10 years, and finally beat the last difficulty in an attempt to prove to myself I’m still not old

What stops them from doing that with code hosted somewhere else as long as it’s publicly accessible?

The crude idea is that it makes US bonds less desirable, meaning they have to increase the interest rate on them, costing the US a lot of money

I don’t know if I would go as far as saying you treated allies and friends well, but it certainly used to be mutually beneficial on the whole at least

Isn’t that what wasm kinda is?

Radioactive waste is obviously dangerous (though to varying degrees, most of it, by volume, is very weakly contaminated if at all), but so are all the chemical wastes from processing ores etc, and for some reason we don’t talk about keeping these secured for as long as they’re dangerous (and unlike radioactive waste, they don’t necessarily become less dangerous over time). And the volume of chemical waste is way higher.

Thinking about nuclear waste is good, but in the same process, you should also think about the environmental damage necessary to produce solar panels. A rarely depicted advantage of nuclear is the relative small amount of material needed to produce that amount of power (including the building of the power plant), and that has huge consequences for pollution upstream, and therefore, safety.

Edit: to be clear, I am not against solar panels in any way, but we should be sure to include all the relevant measurements for all technologies