Also I already said that without an organised boycotting effort no change can be done. Veganism is not very organised. For example in my small (very conservative) city if I were to go vegan I’d be the only one. The suppliers would not notice me not eating a dozen eggs and a few kilos of chicken/meat every month.
Yeah try getting 1 billion people to go vegan. The argument you are making is literally a libertarian “vote with your money” type of wrong.
I wish dude. I wish they werent real. But its worse to live in denial rather than accept the harsh truth that socdems/libs exist.
My problem with this thinking is enough people need to be vegan in a given community for the killing of animals to be reduced. Until enough people become vegan the killed animals would go in the trash. (For example) I believe coffee harvesting is unethical but I still consume coffee because I know my boycott efforts wont even be noticed by the bourgeois let alone lead to less slavery. What I know will make a difference is a socialist revolution which will hopefully eventually put an end to slavery. As long as there is capitalism the meat industry will live on and so will the supposed meat eater propaganda.
I have had so many arguments where I argued a common sense point and a trot or other revisionist argued i was wrong until I quoted Lenin. They care more about whoever is saying it rather than the argument itself.
Imagine what could happen if more countries around the world had successful revolutions and freely traded with one another while less countries were enslaved by the US
Just got banned on reddit from a trot sub (didnt know they were trots) after reading trotskyist bs and replying to it (they accused me of sectarianism but not the trot i was responding to LMAO)
Another day, another banger
Yeah the fact that its a boycot is the problem. Its liberal individualist thinking.