I solved the daily Clues by Sam (Aug 4th 2025) in less than 7 minutes
🟩🟩🟨🟩
🟨🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟨
https://cluesbysam.com/

Not “everything”. Anything.

Literally anything given that time period

The bills to be shredded aren’t legally money. They’re shredded because they were exchanged for new legal tender

however giving out money that already exists doesn’t magically make money

Ex post facto technically. Also that doesn’t pass the common law sniff test for criminal culpability

More than the made up numbers of how many trans people there are

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MIRROR

Nazi site

If you commit serious crimes before you become a U.S. citizen and then lie about them during your naturalization process, the Justice Department will discover the truth and come after you

This is an intentional lie about the definition of “commit crime”. In this case (and pretty much all cases that relate to the government) it means convicted of.

“Dissident”

Were people fired en masse due to COVID?

Nazi site

Why does this website have columns??

He’s in Australia?

Any pathogens would be cooked anyway.

Just a strict reduction in the number of kids looking at porn is an extremely bad metric. Just one child out if the several million or so in the U.K. would technically be a reduction. And the kids going around it is precisely why this sort of regulation doesn’t work.

You have to ask what your goal is. Do you actually just want a strict reduction in the number of kids looking at pornography as if all pornography is created equal. Kids will just go to less moderated sites which will contain higher rates of child pornography, other rape depictions, etc.

These laws are generally supported by two types of people: ones who know how it will be abused to stifle free speech (see: ID required to see protestors arrested by police) and dinosaurs that think the internet works identically to the video rental store.

Edit: I think the reason your comment was downvoted was because of the first sentence. It doesn’t protect children. Not even the most ideal “just gives up immediately after the popup” child.

To be specific, the ruling affirms that “boneless wings” is about the type of “wing” (chicken nugget) not the boned status of the wing. Although I don’t think the ruling is good because the response to ambiguous words isn’t to make their legal meaning more arbitrary. Force the industry to use some other word.

It’s the same thing with half-wings being called “wings”

She’s a public figure, and this information extremely relevant to that status.

Edit: changed and added some words to make comment clearer.

Drones can now carry significant payloads.

This has been true since they first put a camera on them.

Having to prove you’re disabled is also often ableist