I didn’t deny any genocide.
I quoted you directly
But yes, I’m going to continue to take a page from your book. To everything you say: This is false.
- 0 Posts
- 2.14K Comments
Joined 8 months ago
Cake day: December 11th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·6 hours agoLol. You fucking hypocrite.
Oh ok. Mine are also clearly sourced in the Liberal Holy Scripture (Wikipedia) then.
Yeah, that really nails it.
Where do your claims come from?
For almost all of human history, the current center of the the western Overton window would have been considered far, far left. Does that mean that monarchism and feudalism is the true center, and liberalism is actually the same as being to the far right of monarchism?
I’ve never seen such unjustified condescension, my god.
Wow, literally “I have already depicted you as a soyjack”
How does one get to be so ignorant, but also so confident about it?
Liberals will never forgive the USSR for not letting the Nazis have all of Poland.
No communist thinks any country has a “right to exist”.
If you’re throwing the word “liberals” around, you’re an authoritarian, which is no better than being a fascist.
Deeply fucking unserious person
This is false.
Well, I don’t see any point trying to continue to have a discussion with someone who’s just a blunt genocide denier.
Suffice to say, to all your arguments: This is false.
What? Most people seem pretty positive towards Communism.
Ohhhh wait, you think only white westerners are “people”
Sounds like you’re the one betraying us
Congratulations, Zionists also consider “free Palestine” a dog whistle for the destruction of Israel, so you’d better stop saying that too.
Though at this point, hand ringing about whether people are calling for the destruction in Israel is like hand ringing about whether people were calling for the destruction of Nazi Germany in 1942.
Because the French Revolution didnt permanently damage democracy as a political system.
Ok. Neither did the communist revolutions of the 20th century permanently damage communism as a political system.
And democratic system in one form or another existed for millennia before the French Revolution.
As have anarchist and communistic systems.
The USSR and China under the CCP permanently discredited (without any chance of rehabilitation) communism as legitimate ideology.
No. They didn’t. Only too western liberals who were always hostile to communism would say that. The idea that communism is permanently dead just because capitalists didn’t like it is pure “end of history” Neo-liberalist nonsense, and basically ignores the fact that a large chunk of the worlds population still actively feels positively about these revolutionary projects; to say nothing of the people who don’t like those particular ones, but still agree with communism in general.
Besides, so called “liberal democracies” have done far more evil than the USSR or Communist China. In fact, they’re doing a repeat of the Holocaust as we speak. Does that “permanently (without any chance of rehabilitation) discredit democracy as a legitimate ideology”?
No one in their right mind would want anything to do with communism. It’s like asking for genocide, mass killings, gulags, lack of free expression and poverty. No one is going to do that.
Sure, if you’re a complete dullard who has mainlined nothing but pure, concentrated cold war propaganda without any thought or consideration, without ever bothering to open a single book on political theory. Everyone else is not that stupid.
And guess what? You have genocide, mass killings, gulags, lack of free expression, and poverty now, no communism needed. In fact, communism has almost always been associated with a reduction in those things if you actually check the stats.
And I not saying this in the polemical sense used by pro-crime/pro-corruption Americans
Yes, you are. That is exactly how you are saying it.
This is false.
Great, neither will I. Especially not genocide denial.
This is false