I’ll start: while looking at app theming I came across WallRizz, renamed from WallWiz. I haven’t tried it, and looking at it documentation it seems well made, but I cringe at the name and the AI-generated penguin logo. It shares the art style of all the other AI slop, its basically italian brainrot but 2D. WallWiz sounds way better, rizz sounds like it was specially designed for gen alpha (little kids). If there are apps of even similar quality, why would I use this one?
I love hyprland and even anime but having waifus prebuilt into the compositor installation is too much.
RawTherapee and Floorp
No, otherwise I wouldn’t have used GNOME in the past. I stopped using it because it changed too much for me not because its logo is a smelly foot. I also think KDE Khas Kterrible Kbranding but I still use it now that I prefer it to GNOME and got bored with MATE.
Calibre looks like a toddler designed it with a box of broken, half-missing dollar store crayons. I don’t care how great it works, I cannot bring myself to use it.
Would you use the cli?
One of the cool things I liked about calibre is that extensions worked via the cli interface as well, which made it easy to do batch workflows of operations on ebooks.
The dev also made Kitty which I use daily, but its much easier to theme a terminal than a GUI.
The weasel humping a ball logo (IceWeasel).
who fucking cares
I’m with you - if a program does a good job of what it’s set out to do, why avoid it because of a dumb name or less than stellar UI?
Removed by mod
This is an LLM bot. Its comments have not been correctly formatted such that it leaves a stray quotation at the end.
Absolutely. Reposting from a year ago:
There is a certain strain of open source development that is nearly anti-marketing, as far as I can tell. They choose names like “gimp”, “git”, “frotz”, “borg”, “pooch”, “butt”, “slurm”, “mutt”, “snort”, and “floorp”.
reminds me of one of the main mbin instances, moist.catsweat.com
You forgot scrot.
More fool you. There’s some damn good software in that list.
GIMP is a very powerful and important piece of software that I wish they weren’t so obstinate about giving the worst name ever. I know it’s just an acronym, but it is in effect the name of the project. I’ve taken to calling it GNU IMP instead.
For a while there, there was a fork of GIMP that simply changed the name to Glimpse. That was the only one I felt comfortable mentioning in professional contexts.
Some years ago I got in touch with one of the primary maintainers of that fork in the interest of continuing the project after realizing it was so stagnant, and I was essentially warned that doing so would open myself to immense harassment, and that harassment was why everyone involved stopped with the project in the first place. So…what is all of this about “if you don’t like X, fork it” if that is what will happen when one does? Seems pretty rotten advice to give if it’s just going to be sabotaged without any support anyway. Someone I know still uses the outdated Glimpse regardless.
Isn’t imp also kind of demeaning to short people?
No.
Thanks
Why not Gee-IMP?
Any service or tool with obvious genAI in its branding or the developer’s profile is an instant “no” from me. Linkwarden is a big one. Any advertisement post clearly written by an LLM I’ll avoid like the plague. If you’re willing to use hallucinations based on theft that use unbelievable amounts of water and energy, then I’m flat out not going to trust that your software has any value.
Also seen a handful of random tools with “Proudly made in the USA” or some garbage on the readme, and sure enough the developer always follows all of today’s big fascists on social media. Shocker.
I don’t want to have anything to do with GNU TALER.
Gnutella on the other hand… Too bad it wasn’t actually open source.
Oh my, yes. Before I entered the world of free software, I was turned off by it. Reason is, I thought to myself, hold on: “If it’s gratis, then it’s going to be at the level of quality from all of these malware-ridden, barely functional, shareware programs.” Luckily I’m smarter now, but free software has a branding problem. It results from these programs often being developed by incredibly competent turbo nerds, the result of this is the advertisement reads like a technical manual or a spec sheet.
Proper advertising is helpful. It informs users about what they can do with the programme. They don’t care about it being programmed in hyper-efficient C, optimized with hardware acceleration or the underlying mathematical principles of how something is being processed. They care about getting the results they want. Instead of darktable, for example, talking about “4x32-bit floating point pixel buffers”, instead, they should talk about what users can use Darktable for. Sell the fantasy of belonging to the best, only thanks to Darktable and getting superior results from the programme. Show people the stunning results that real pros got by using Darktable. Show that there is a real community around the programme, and not just a GitHub repo. These things matter.
Darktable, in my opinion, is the best raw editor out there, and yes, the “4x32-bit floating point pixel buffers” and other incredibly well thought out features are the reason why that is. But 99% of users wouldn’t know why these things listed as their features are so massively useful and make Darktable so ridiculously superior compared to the competition.
I genuinely think that if more free software projects would invest in proper advertising and branding, that GNU/Linux and free software on it wouldn’t have 3% market share, but would be the monopoly in the computing market.
See, with nice marketing comes wide recognition, with recognition come normies, and with normies comes the mental burden of dealing with “this doesn’t work, the program is shit, fix it immediately!!!” kinds of issues. Not everyone wants to do it in their spare time.
Also, I have a rudimentary idea how to fix this. So if anyone who’s more competent than me would like to have a go at it, please do so.
Basically found a non-profit ad agency for free software. Basically the agency would create turnkey ad and branding concepts for certain free software projects that would like to have it and in return they get 5% of their donations, for example. All of the money gets reinvested back into the advertising for the member software projects. Also, it could be very easy, the ad agency would, in broad strokes, just have a competition parity strategy where they essentially do whatever the competition does, in broad strokes, for their advertising and “just” adapt it to what the free software project needs.
Yes, it’s some random “idea guy” on the internet coming up with something that’s coherent and smart sounding. So take it for what you will.
As more of an art and design person than a technical one, yeah almost undoubtedly, though I can’t think of specific examples
But I really appreciate the work that goes into a beautiful logo, typography, or UI, and that will often sway me, probably more than it should
Void’s beautiful logo/logotype is what originally got me interested in it as a distro, and the only reason I’m not using it now is cause I’m a dummy and minimal distros require I use my brain a lot more than I’ve thus far been willing to get my computer up and going
“Italian”?
I meaant italian brainrot, which isn’t necessarily supposed to be italian, that’s just the name. Some of the worst ai images yet imo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_brainrot
