I mentioned two separate characters in my comment, the Tibetan monk first, and the second being the Romani character. I’m not sure how that was unclear.
While that would have made it more explicit yes, it wasn’t that hard to figure out they were talking about two different characters when you understand that the bald monk wasn’t labelled romani
I mentioned two separate characters in my comment, the Tibetan monk first, and the second being the Romani character. I’m not sure how that was unclear.
I think the “this” in “this implies” can read as referring to the casting choice for the tibetan monk, not to the meme itself.
It was unclear because you switched topic mid sentence without even using a comma. We ain’t mind readers.
While that would have made it more explicit yes, it wasn’t that hard to figure out they were talking about two different characters when you understand that the bald monk wasn’t labelled romani