• Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    The biggest problem NASA has is they operate under the whims of the US government, while SpaceX doesn’t.

    Space research and operations require very long-term planning, you can’t change direction every 4 years, just because a new president has different ideas than the previous one, it’s already a miracle that NASA has been able to do what they’re doing in this awful conditions.

    No wonder SpaceX took over. It’s not NASA’s fault but the US government.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And the way the U.S. government is structured encourages a two-party system which flip-flops back and forth, which is particularly ill-suited for long-term projects like space exploration.

  • Sergio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Too painful to read this… and to think of all that we have lost. We sold off so much of value just to save a few dollars in the short run…

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Seen from outside US, NASA decline has begun way earlier than Elon Musk appearance, it begun when NASA was used as a piggy bank by US politicians.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    a planet millions of miles away, where colonists will be insulated from the ravages of nuclear war, climate change, malevolent AI, and all the unforeseen disasters that will inevitably crush life on Earth

    What sort of doomerism is this? I’m pretty sure we want to live on both planets in the long term, not just move to the worse one.