• simsalabim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I didn’t even think about it. I’m 45, my mom had me at 30, my grandfather was old enough to fight in WW2 and he was barely old enough to fight in the war so my grandmother wouldn’t have been 12 in the 1920s. Yeah, the math makes no sense.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Just looked it up, she’s 34. So even if her mom was the youngest child of her grandma, she would had to have been 60+ when she had her.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think the math is fine?

        2025 - 1927 = 98 (years since grandma was born)

        98 - 34 = 74 (years between grandma’s birth and OP’s)

        74 / 2 = 37 (average age of grandma and OP’s parent when OP’s line was born)

        Note that OP’s parent could be her father (assuming the research didn’t reveal it was her mother), which means that one generation might not need to avoid menopause age. Grandma could have had OP’s father at 27, and then father could have had her with a 27 year old (when he was 47) and it would all work out. Hell, even at the extreme, gma has father at 12, then father has OP at 62 with someone of any age.

        Not saying it’s right; 12 year olds should be playing anything other than baby factory and housemaid to some old fuck. But the math seems fine to me.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma?