What we need to do is not make legal headaches for db0 by allowing our users to post people’s social security numbers online when republicans are notorious for using litigation as a weapon to harass people they don’t like.
Oh sorry, I didn’t know this was .world. I guess we should also make sure not to bad mouth Zionism as that’s antisemitic and may cause headaches. Better delete the piracy comms, they’re also legal headaches.
Don’t use words you heard on the internet until you actually know what they mean.
An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack. I didn’t attempt to refute anything, I just insulted you. So it’s not an ad hominem, because I’m not arguing with you, I’m dismissing you entirely because I don’t think you or your viewpoint is important enough to me to waste my time discussing it further.
Were they innocent persons?
Is this your attempt at a serious argument?
We don’t need to be polite with them, they’re fash. Who cares if they get doxxed when they deserve far worse.
What we need to do is not make legal headaches for db0 by allowing our users to post people’s social security numbers online when republicans are notorious for using litigation as a weapon to harass people they don’t like.
Oh sorry, I didn’t know this was .world. I guess we should also make sure not to bad mouth Zionism as that’s antisemitic and may cause headaches. Better delete the piracy comms, they’re also legal headaches.
Did that little tantrum make you feel a little better, Champ?
Resorting to ad hominems? Okay.
Don’t use words you heard on the internet until you actually know what they mean.
An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack. I didn’t attempt to refute anything, I just insulted you. So it’s not an ad hominem, because I’m not arguing with you, I’m dismissing you entirely because I don’t think you or your viewpoint is important enough to me to waste my time discussing it further.