☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

  • 1.37K Posts
  • 437 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 30th, 2020

help-circle

  • I think the next big idea could be models dynamically training sub models on demand. There are approaches like HRM being explored that require far less training data and scope of parameters already. Another avenue being explored focuses on creating reusable memory components as seen with MemOS. It blurs the line between training and operational modes, where the model just continuously learns. What we might see is models that create an agent to learn a new task, and then once it’s learned it can be used and shared going forward.

    From what we know, human intelligence is also structured hierarchically, where the brain has regions responsible for different tasks like vision processing, and then there’s a high level reasoning system built on top of that.


  • I really like the take from Wang Jian who founded Alibaba Cloud. His view is that AGI is a meaningless term. In practice, it’s a gradient where capabilities of the models continue to improve across different spectrums, and they continue to become more useful.

    In terms of the whole singularity thing, it’s certainly not out of the realm of possibility. For example, stuff like this is already happening where the discovery of better models is becoming automated. The question is where things start to plateau.

    Overall, I’m fairly optimistic as well. I think it’s almost certain that China will drive most of the progress because they have the industries to apply this tech. We already see automation in factories, robots being increasingly used to do manual labour, stuff like self driving trucks, etc. It’s entirely likely that a lot of hard jobs will be automated within a decade or so.

    At the same time, I do expect this tech will have negative consequences in capitalist societies where it will displace labour and drive unemployment. I’d argue that deepening inequalities will necessarily lead to further radicalization of the workers, and would help convince people that capitalism is not sustainable.















  • It’s more than just control of inputs. China is a huge market for chips, and it would be a massive blow to nvidia to lose access to this market. Their revenue would go down significantly as a result. On top of that, Chinese companies are already catching up to nvidia, and they’re going to compete on the global market soon. This is the real nightmare scenario for nvidia, because the same thing will happen that we saw happen with stuff like EVs and solar panels. China is going to flood the world with much cheaper chips that are going to be as good or better than anything nvidia can make. At that point, nvidia is looking at a collapse of their global market share. The west will ban Chinese chips, but the rest of the world won’t, and the west on its own is just not big enough of a market.