:)

I see, well, it it still serves you good, nothing to say here

Good point! I totally forgot that.

But if I am able to recall correctly the QoS for the VoLTE and just regular data is totally different and the antenna may refused to provide you enough data for a non-prior service

???

There are a lot of reputable VoIP companies, my employer right now uses them and we never faced a problem. But makes sure it is reputable ;)

And you could also port your number so to all effects it is your number.

I don’t know, I still believe it is the easiest way forward. But in the end it is your call

That much? Shit, then update the processor, probably spending 15€ is going to update the speed a lot!

Uh?!?

If that equipment is not able to get 60Mb/s there is something terrible wrong here…

What you need is a sip server / interface for making VoIP call through internet, there are many implementations and servers, selfhosted and paid. Pick up one you like.

Please, be aware that the quality of the voice call depends and a lot of the data rate. Keep this in mind uif you are in remote locations with poor coverage.

It is always recommended the asterisk + the freepbx for the gui. Please be aware that I don’t have experience with those systems

I think I didn’t get exactly what you want. Ant it keeps me wondering that perhaps there are a few concepts not so clear.

Do you want to receive streaming from a server? do you want to setup the server? Or something completely else?

If you want to receive the streaming from a server, the most compatible cost-effective solution is the Amazon fire. Works with remotes and you will be able to play every media you have because the server will transcode the file on the fly if the fire stick doesn’t support the format.

If you want something more open to tinker or to get more functionality then a raspberry pi will be enough, because once again, the heavy lifting is done by the servers (via plex server or moonlight server).

More powerful boxes exists but then you need to start thinking carefully what is your use case for not eating money.

This type of posts always reminds me a conversation I had with some friends, where they always claimed that the lack of rules, safety measures and freedom to smoke when I was 6, and all the mentality/concept/vision of the world is now considered really bad, difficult to accept or comprehend for modern mentalities.

And we survived, they always reassesed.

But the point is we didn’t, lot of fellas died in the process, alcohol was socially accepted as a way to deal with problems to the point that life-risk jobs were having daily accidents and 99% of them the guy was really alcohol fucked.

But the deads were not there to disagree. It is only survival biases. And a lack of memories about who could not deal with the situations…

I have friends and relatives in all those countries.

Not posible this poll is right without a severe cook in the numbers or the questions…

Precisely bitwarden movement proves my point. Bitwarden tried to degrade the features/compatibility of the solution and they couldn’t because of the vaultwarden implementation.

Can they always add new features after a pay wall? Sure! But once foss Sw is here it is simple impossible to remove functionality, at most, to get some coins for services not fully selfhosted.

If tailscale tries to do something similar is goint to be a shoot into their own leg, because all the sw already disclosed makes it impossible. Could they make the relay a paid one? Sure but then they will face the competence of a vps with the Headscale implementation.

This and only this is because in your home lab only foss Sw should be allowed, even if you need to pay some money from time to time

Honestly, this seems more than your assumptions and fears than anything else.

Clients are open source and foss, the moment something strange is in, Headscale could adapt.

If they finally goes to full close source, then the community will fork (emby - jellyfinn drama).

Your arguments don’t hold together, for the good of the community

I really don’t see how the enshitification could work when we have the fee version of the central servers Headscale

So yes, it could be a pay wall for some advance featuresike funnels and so on. But the primary use is secured…

And without counting that Romans were the first ones in building sewers for the Grey waters, and most of them were not in contact with the air…

I have more than 120 electronic identities, impossible to track the counter or to remember the tld of all websites I visit.

The concepts is only useful in a very small and defined scenario.

I’d Lineageos solving the problem of the camera’s quality and the banking application refusing to work?

Honestly I totally disagree, this community is about avoiding SaaS and controlling the important part of the stack to keep your own data under control.

If the service you need is just a provider of vm for your own business, is not a contradiction and it is still selfhosted as long as you control it.

Check it again, I used it for years before switching to something with more features

If you have a prosumer router I suggest you to use the ddns in the router plus a reverse proxy. This would be the cleanest solution.

If you can not, once everything is working with your external access to the synology, the dsm has a built-in reverse proxy so it can redirect http requests to another server. Although this proxy is really simple and limited it can get the work done if you setup is simple enough.

Got it.

But looking that the question has been posted in a selfhosted thread I don’t see the recomendation of the cloud solution :)

Why?

There are not benefits in the cloud solution over the hosted server. It could even be more expensive on the long run…

And yes, kasm has a cloud solution in its web page