How would a false positive create more harm? Isn’t it better to cast a wide net and detect more possible cases? Then false negatives are the ones that worry me the most.

Everyone else who grew up eating them (and fucking loves them) looking at this thread is like:

At no point in history was there ever a Palestinian country

Then why did the Brits use the word Palestine?

There is no Palestinian that can trace his lineage to some Palestinian hundreds of years ago.

Are you like a disinformation bot??? How do you even suggest to prove this claim???

I thought no babies were decapitated. This turned out to be disinformation :/ in case you missed the memo

https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/10/12/40-israeli-babies-beheaded-by-hamas/

At this point I think you’re just a misinformation bot lol

If Israel is trying its best not to hurt civilians, then why is an unreasonable amount of civilians dead by everyone else’s account except for yours and Israel’s?

I won’t comment about not considering them journalists since I think that’s a weak speculative argument with nothing to back it up (all journalists killed could be traced to an organization they worked for or freelanced for). So I’m ignored this BS.

. Israel is doing everything possible to kill only combatants.

Hmmm, so why does Israel use dumb bombs and large missiles that caused the Christmas Massacre for example? 🤔

Also what about all the dead journalists? If Israel can’t help but shoot at people whose vests say PRESS, then why should I believe this claim of yours?

Everything on the news today. That’s proof.

Yes, antisemitism exists. No, Palestinians as a collective don’t want to kill all Jews. The Israel government on the other hand is adamant to kill every last Palestinian or ethnically cleanse them with forced displacement.

And no, I did not go to those protests, and if I did I would have spoken up about it and not let people chant such bullshit.

And no, I don’t go to mosques, I’m an atheist.

Ah yes and the antisemitism in books claim:

One religious studies textbook asks students to discuss the “repeated attempts by the Jews to kill the prophet” Muhammad and asks who are “other enemies of Islam.”

This is a historical event, regarding specifically the Jewish tribes near Mecca. That being said, fuck Mohammed and fuck Israel just the same.

A math text showed a picture of Palestinians hitting Israeli soldiers with slingshots to describe Newton’s second law of motion.

LOL. What is the issue exactly? Doesn’t say “Jews”, says specifically hitting an Israel soldier, as one should when all means of resistance have run out.

Another textbook “promotes a conspiracy theory that Israel removed the original stones of ancient sites in Jerusalem and replaced them with ones bearing “Zionist drawings and shapes.”

Yes, good example of antisemitism, haven’t double checked this though and don’t really know what it refers to 🤔 pretty sure Israel ruined all sorts of historical Palestinian sites anyway.

About Dalal Al Maghrebi, yeah, that’s bad, I agree, she should not be hailed as a hero.

I’m Palestinian, grew up in a Palestinian family, went to lots of protests, “Kill all Jews” is not something people say out or appreciate. The problem is with Zionists, not Jew.

That being said, totally legal to march in Israel and chant “Death to all Arabs”

Well, in my defence, a lot of what you are saying IS bullshit.

Maybe. Why? Does it bother you if people call out Israel?

##tl;dr Because Israel is breaking international law.

Westerner? How many assumptions are you making about me?

Oh wait yeah you are trolling, I see. Otherwise why would you come up with crap? Have a nice day 😊

Oh no forgive me it was a DIFFERENT government building! Lmfao

Who the fuck mentioned God?

You need to keep up with the IDF please

Don’t play this bullshit with me.

Good, I hope you enjoy your coffee. The more time you spend on coffee is less time you spend on the internet defending a genocidal apartheid project.

About the BBC link:

As BBC News covered initial reports that Israeli forces had entered Gaza’s main hospital, we said that “medical teams and Arab speakers” were being targeted. This was incorrect and misquoted a Reuters report. We should have said IDF forces included medical teams and Arabic speakers for this operation. We apologise for this error, which fell below our usual editorial standards. The correct version of events was broadcast minutes later and we apologised for the mistake on air later in the morning.

lol buddy seriously, are you unhappy that they do good journalism? That they correct their mistakes? Go read all the other reports from Reuters. Didn’t the IDF kill one of their photographers earlier? 😬 😬

I’m not bothering to look at your like 8 links because the first 4 were bullshit and humans only live for so long, would rather make time for a nice cup of coffee instead.

Screaming “proof, proof, proof” isn’t proof, sorry.

The 300 liters of fuel were shameful and offensive, the IDF should be ashamed. Israeli is the reason these babies are dying, and 300 liters were not enough. On top of that the IDF published a recording with someone at the hospital stating that they “didn’t want to accept the fuel”… but of course when you speak fucking Arabic, you can hear clearly that it says, “this amount [of fuel] is not okay”, since the IDF promised 2k then delivered 0.3k… even though Israel is the reason they don’t have fuel and are dying. Pathetic “evidence”, a recording of a few seconds because the rest of the call would have made it clear what the topic was about.

Israel doesn’t have convincing evidence, period.

First link is from X, just Israeli soldiers delivering 300 liters of fuel that won’t run the hospital for more than an hour, a troll move.

Second “proof” is an article from 2014. No one ever denied there being tunnels, that would be fucking stupid.

The third one is also from 2014 and behind a paywall.

The fourth one is a link to a google book but I can’t read any pages.

And now I’m not even bothering to click the rest.

Has it ever occurred to you that it’s not enough to just post hyperlinks and say they are “proof”? Do you understand that it should also entail containing a “proof”? Evidence is not just providing a link or video, it has to actually show something tangible. Israel has failed at that miserably again and again.