It is an open source architecture but it doesn’t prevent the OEM from adding anything to it to prevent user from doing anything on it. They can add TPM, locked bootloader with fixed signing key stored on board. They can add microprocessor inaccessible to anyone but OEM. They can add spyware, malware. All this without any need for declaring it or need to make it open source.

The only change RISC V brings is there is no need to pay for a hardware architecture, benefitting the manufacturer. Rather than bringing freedom to the user.

The elected government and the judiciary did it. Much more than what US has done. Electing a treasonous, rapist felon to be your president.

Marine Le Pen was convicted and banned from participating in political office for mere embezzling.

Now your turn.

Thank God for that

Please tell me this was satirical piece.

They know to whom else are you going to vote.

It seems that this is not the first time some had asked for password. Perhaps was the first time the hacker asked for it.

Not Manmohan, mammogram.

Google keyboard swipe not that accurate.

Checking for a fetus is called proving, by a pregnancy test.

Unfortunately voicing fully legal traditional right wing views results in real consequences.

Closer but no banana.

Hate speech might be legal but it does have real world consequence.

And then US toppled a democratically elected president because he decided to nationalise petroleum, pushing it into chaos.

Please add the qualifier:

If found…

Can there be another Whigs party

If even after putting out fire the house burns down you do have to cut your loses and let the house burn down.

You can shift the blame all you want but the truth that this is the outcome people of Texas votes for won’t change. Women being rejected necessary care for a healthy life.

The best consequences I can hope for is all the doctors move out of the state along with all the people who wish to have a healthy life.

Yes but there is laws which prosecute doctors for abortion, which is a consequence of pregnancy.

Were they right to deny the investigation to your wife? No absolutely not.

Having said that, it is understandable why the blanket decision was taken.

My point is the doctor shouldn’t be prosecuted for taking a decision that the government is forcing them to take. The blame doesn’t lie with the doctors but the government the people chose to make the laws.

This is what happens when the medical decision has to be guided by legal principles instead of medical reasonings.

Your anger understandable but directed at the wrong entity. It should be directed towards the government rather than the doctors. They might have been the face of decision taken to deny your wife care but it is not theirs.

It is Trump’s America only because inspite of what people might say America is far closer to be like Saudi Arabia than any Nordic countries.

What if the the mammogram fails to detect it and she still dies?

Manmohan Mammogram is not 100% accurate.

I specifically said in the case which you elaborated in your reply the rejection was wrong. My response was to what you had shared in your original post before.

According to the limited details you had shared before one can propose why the rejection was done.

The problem is not the doctors rejecting care, deciding to safeguard themselves. Only because when the government decides to prosecute anyone it is always the doctor. And the patients that doctor might have cared for no where to be seen.