As far as reasoning goes, ten points. It doesn’t help with the fact that it’s still pretty generic and frequent word/name both alone and as a part of a compositum (see: https://corpora.uni-leipzig.de/en/res?corpusId=eng_news_2024&word=void ) though.

Before arguing that Indians did not really cultivate the lands they cultivated in a manner that Europeans just failed to understand as such.

I don’t mean to be negative, but the name is generic and second brain as a term is not really descriptive at all. In fact I hope that second brain as a term never really catches on. Why that name though?

My point was that even one phone with the WhatsApp app itself can mean compromised opsec. No matter if it’s used for operational communication or not, or whether or not the messages can be read by 3rd parties or not.

Doesn’t really matter, it’s the metadata that reveals your connections and locations. Surprisingly big amount of useful (but not necessarily correct or verifiable) intel can be gathered without eavesdropping into the actual conversations. People have been - on other occasions - targeted because they were connected to a person, who’s connections may have been suspicious to some state actors.