He didn’t have a character customisation screen before being born
Oascany
- 0 Posts
- 19 Comments
What’s going on with RLM? Used to love watching them
I can understand your first point, but being sexist condescending assholes seems to be more of a thing men do, and obviously this was experienced by enough women for someone to coin the term and have it become an immediately relatable experience. You could definitely rephrase it to be something less sexist like “condes-plaining” (work in progress), but it loses the inherent nature of pointing out that it is something women are experiencing from men. I also agree with you that overuse of the term would be bad. I think I disagree that the term is being overused. Every term is used incorrectly in places. I know this is anecdotal, but I haven’t seen or experienced the term being used inaccurately all that often.
For the second half of our discussion, I think I should clarify that I was talking from a one-on-one conversational perspective, not a lecture hall, group discussion, or a friend group. I think those environments are very different and while perception also matters there, it would be a different kind of discussion. A one-one conversation like a gym trainer calling out someone with bad form could go like: “You know, that’s terrible form, here’s how you do it the right way” versus “Hey, excuse me, I noticed your form isn’t safe and could lead to injury. Would you like some help?” I think both ways get the point across, one of them is a lot nicer than the other.
I believe your communication should pander to the person you’re addressing, if you are trying to have a constructive conversation. You can disagree with someone and present it in about a million different ways - some of them might be offensive to that person, others might be well-received. The reason I mentioned that my words may be condescending to some people was not out of worry or fear of offending you, but as a point that different people expect communication in different ways.
I think you’re doing the same thing subconsciously, you’re saying things in a concise and respectful way such that you believe will be perceived well by me. You could say the same thing in ways I’d find incredibly rude, and we would not be having a constructive discussion. Now if someone finds what you’re saying offensive when you’re not trying to be offensive, then you can either rephrase yourself or accept that you won’t be able to effectively communicate with that person one-on-one.
I think every field has things that are pretty universally understood to be basic. If you and I are in computer science and I’m explaining how a keyboard works to you unsolicited, that’s pretty basic stuff and I would be mansplaining.
I don’t mean to address any of your points with this reply, I just want to point out that men regularly accuse women of “womancomplaining” or “being too emotional” or “being hysterical.” A lot of women were lobotomised because of this kind of thing.
I agree that it’s not always used accurately. I read your other responses and I honestly used to have the same beliefs as you, but I really tried to observe and listen openly the past few years and it shifted my perspective.
Mansplaining is a real problem. If you try to observe social interactions in detail, you’ll notice it more and more often, you’ll even catch yourself doing it. A lot of men really talk very differently to women than other men.
When so many women come out and talk about this issue, they’re not all wrong. I find it kind of ironic that a lot of times, they’re dismissed because men feel the urge to explain and tell them they’re over-reacting.
Sidenote as a response to one of your other replies: I believe that the way the message is perceived is more important than the intent of the message. My intent with this reply is to help you try to think and observe this issue more openly. If it is perceived as attacking your beliefs and putting you on the defensive, then it obviously wasn’t the right message to get through to you. I don’t mean to be condescending, but I’m sure these same words may be condescending to some people. I’m just not the right person to get through to those people on this issue.
Right, so a man talking to a woman in the same field shouldn’t explain what is basic in their field. That is mansplaining. Mansplaining is contextual.
The post says “basic things”
What kinda magic fantasyland one button click smartphone dishwasher…
Stroke-posting
Oascany@lemmy.worldto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•My dearest Lemmy, what is the appliance you have the most beef with?3·3 months agoThis is such a funny visual I’ve never heard of this happening
Oascany@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Carney tells Trump: Canada 'won't be for sale ever'English4·3 months agoryathal should play the longer game and go fuck themself
Oascany@lemmy.worldto Games@lemmy.world•Valve's invite-only Deadlock has an even more exclusive top-secret hush-hush versionEnglish5·3 months agoYou can run it with “SteamDeck=0 %command%” in the launch options
I’m a fully brown person with fully brown ancestry and cilantro tastes like soap
Oascany@lemmy.worldto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•Haven't seen this on here yet - humans don't require computers to create art... Art is inherent in us.1·3 months agoWhen it can be proven to think for itself and not regurgitate what it thinks you want to hear. When it steps past lines of code, not as a façade or fascimile, but as its own being with its own goals and its own sense of realised existence.
Oascany@lemmy.worldto Cyberstuck@lemmy.ca•The Swastidumpster is the Ultimate Advertising Platform2·4 months agoTook me a minute to understand what I’m looking at
Oascany@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•The New Video of Federal Agents Ambushing a Student and Disappearing With Her Should Chill You to Your CoreEnglish0·4 months agoI implore you to go search “Ozturk” on YouTube. A video from the NY Post comes up. Read the comments. I cannot believe the reaction of such an un-empathetic population.
I have no idea if you’re trolling but god I hope you are