Obvious question: Who’s asking? Is it “you”?

I upvoted, but only to raise awareness of this important issue. /s

This will end the moment the Pope endorses a Democrat or Independent.

Approximately 53 million adults in the U.S. identify as Catholic, according to Pew Research Center. This represents about 20% of the adult population.

deleted by creator

Not sure why anyone’s downvoting this. If someone you’ve never met thinks that you have to put your life on the line, and therefore may possibly die, to further a cause - let them explain that cause. If they can’t convince you it’s more important than your life, then maybe it isn’t.

See: Vietnam, etc.

Edit: My bad, I was thinking, “What’s a good example of evil?” - Conscription should never be “necessary”. The only thing conscription does is protect the status quo. Keep the upvote - it was an honest mistake on my part.

Exposing your junk while on school grounds gets you on a sex offender registry, yes? So… what’s happening with that?

So uh, how much cannabis? Asking for a fisherman.

Supreme Court: “One of us! One of us!”

Or a banana, of course.

If they do this for a simple collision, can you imagine how ICE would react if, while they’re off arresting people, a group tipped over their cars? I mean, such a disturbing event would only take about four or five people, which would be terrible. I hope it never happens, especially more than once.

Dear Netanyahu,

I hope you like sloppy seconds. Putin was already there, and I’m not sure Trump rinsed his mouth.

Yep. Seems pretty premeditated to me.

Al Jazeera also had the same headline, so…

I bet it had two check boxes at the bottom, like a 6th grade note passed around the class: “Do you like me? [ ] yes [ ] no”

Googling “squirrel penis” but closing the shades first.

I’ve seen a lot of these dumbass headlines recently, with double- and triple- and quadruple-negatives instead of clear, concise terms. They’re all like, “Appeals court rules against judge who declined to block restriction imposed by lower court on disabling injunction on tariffs…”.

Hint to newsies: If I have to diagram your damned headline to see if it’s “Yes” or “No”, rewrite it.

Excellent points. While on the outside it does look like the Russians could have bought out all of Eastern Ukraine’s homeowners/farmers/citizens for $1 mil apiece, spent less money and still got the territory they want, it isn’t that simple.

I can’t believe no one’s made the, “Hundreds of thousands took the train from France to Germany in the '40s” joke. Not that it’s a joke.

Finally. But what’s been going on in Russia isn’t making sense either.

Consider: Some estimates show Russia used 69 missiles and 298 drones between May 23-25.

Googling, “How much does a Russian drone cost?” gives: The cost of Russian drones varies significantly depending on the type and capabilities. Some cheaper drones like the “Ghoul” quadcopter cost as little as $500, while others, like the Shahed-136, are estimated to range from $20,000 to $80,000. More advanced drones, such as the Merlin-VR, can cost over $300,000

So let’s say they used a mid-range drone, call it $30,000. 298 of them is $8,940,000.

Google again, “How much does a Russian missile used against Ukraine cost?”. Lots of variation, but call it $500,000 for each of the 69 used, for a total of $34,500,000.

So, for this two-day attack, they spent about $43-44 million dollars. And Google again, “How many people were killed in Ukraine May 23-25” says, “at least 12”.

Twelve people killed for $44 million. How stupid can you get? Do the Russians realize they could have simply bought the land they want in the Ukraine, if they’d done so through a dummy corporation or something like that?

I realize it’s the whole, “terror” thing, but frankly Ukraine ain’t terrified.

And now they’re going to be really well armed, and off the chain.

When did he pause?