you do realize your comment doesn’t make sense in this thread ?

that’s a very strange phrasing.

do you mean “people shouldn’t be having kids until they’re mature and comfortable financially” ?

the text is actually from a pre-existing post

I’m looking for the source, because it does look like AI slop

what’s the original painting ?

they have the same shit as everybody else, because we don’t have a choice (yet)

je suis venu ici pour dire la même chose

not a shitpost

that’s the neat part

you can’t possibly know that

An egg is the same thing, albeit much simpler

Good news, everyone !

there’s no way to make delivery worth it for small items like this, be it by foot / bike / electric scooter / carrier pigeon

look closely, it’s AI slop yet again

some businesses just deserve to die, and are actively working towards it

skill issue

there’s such a thing called “copyright”, and using countless pieces of art for free so that a couple of douchebags become gazillionnaires selling copyright infringement on said pieces of art certainly feels like theft

the difference in price would be so small you wouldn’t even care

the price of your clothing is mostly supply chain “middle-men” taking their share, not the source material nor the people actuality bringing it to shape. especially with synthetic materials

if it weren’t true (i.e. if the material actually cost that much), stores wouldn’t literally destroy / throw away brand new clothes just to “refresh” every couple of weeks

it’s been trained on art stolen from people who can draw orders of magnitude better than this

when writing somewhat low-level code, you always make assumptions about things. in this case, they chose to manage 256 entries in some array; the bound used to be lower.

but implicitly there’s a tradeoff, probably memory / CPU utilisation in the server.

it’s always about the tradeoff between what the users want, what is easier for you to maintain, what your infrastructure can provide, etc.