At best, that’s reductive and at worst it’s completely wrong. I get that this was probably a joke answer, but I feel like this misconception is unfortunate since it misrepresents ancient Egyptian culture and also undermines the impact of the unique evil of chattel slavery that was practiced in the US.
- 0 Posts
- 26 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: March 8th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
3·1 month agoIt’s an interesting concept, but aside from the scalability issues mentioned, I don’t think demographics are necessarily an indicator of a judge’s biases cough Clarence Thomas cough.
5·1 month agoWould they though? In the war of “me vs annoying insects sneaking into my house”, the indoor spiders I leave undisturbed seem pretty squarely on my side…
Wow, I came to the comments section to drop the word “lecherous” only to find you casually fitting it into a reply…
4·1 month agoIt’s an interesting video in the sense that it seems like an honest attempt at just understanding the problem without really proposing a solution or call to action, which I appreciate. It briefly touches on two points that I thought were interesting:
-
Algorithms help us solve a “short term” problem that is really a symptom of a larger problem. And unfortunately, the best “short term” solution gets us farther away from addressing the larger issue. Specifically, engagement algorithms help us “solve” the problems of being bored and wanting connection. But while it helps us pass time (and feel some level of connection to the creators of whatever content we consume), in the end we feel less fulfilled and more lonely. And the quick satisfaction of the algorithm ends up making it even harder to put the work in to accomplishing things that are actually meaningful and going out into the real world to form real connections.
-
Engagement algorithms go beyond echo chambers into actually changing people. The issue of engagement algorithms only exposing you to amplified versions of things you already believe is something I remember reading about years ago. But this video points out that you can actually end up adopting entirely new interests and ideologies just because people who are similar to you engage with those things. So in a way, these algorithms can end up creating entirely new “communities” of people who are identified, not by what they really care about or believe, but by what common topics are most engaging to the community. Which is crazy because that effectively amounts to a group of addicts bonding over the substance that they are addicted to, but thinking of it as an identity rather than a problem.
A surprisingly thought-provoking video from one of my favorite motorcycle channels.
-
6·1 month agoHoward refused but accepted another position with the mayor instead, insisting that he did not feel victimized by the incident. On the contrary, Howard felt that he had learned from the situation. “I used to think it would be great if we could all be colorblind; that’s naïve, especially for a white person, because a white person [can] afford to be colorblind. They don’t have to think about race every day. An African American does.”
Wow; I was surprised to get to the first controversy and discover such a thoughtful and empathetic take on the topic.
I 100% agree with the idea that rap is certainly not the only genre to glorify violence, drugs, etc. But the specific song choice is not really a great example in my opinion considering the last verse is
C’mon you gotta listen unto me
lay off that whiskey, and let that cocaine be.
This song always struck me as a cautionary tale. Nothing about the song really seems to glorify the behavior.
3·2 months agoFor this specific HN post, speedrunning is a bit of a misnomer. He used similar tooling to effectively add support for a physical keyboard and additionally a bunch of keyboard shortcuts that are capable of inputting custom text, songs, and fabric patterns.
There’s a YouTube video where the author showcases this. It’s pretty short and a really interesting watch: https://youtu.be/Yw8Alf_lolA
I do have enough time, but I don’t have the self control. If I could hold myself to an hour a day, that would be fantastic, but I inevitably get myself too addicted and end up spending closer to 4 hours a day. At that point, all my other chores aren’t getting done. As a result, I haven’t played video games in several years.
That’s a fair point. I was under the assumption that they were still using the “invasion” thing since that was what they leaned into for the deportations. I can definitely see them going with “rebellion” instead.
Seems like there is some (temporary) good news on the topic at least:
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday directing President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California.
The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump’s statutory authority.
I appreciate you being upfront about your source, lol. Here’s some info from AP News to help clarify a bit.
Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10.
The relevant part of Title 10 is explained here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406
Which basically says that the federal government can deploy the National Guard when
the United States […] is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation
So Trump is (falsely) claiming that the protesters are helping Mexico/Venezuela/Wherever to “invade” California. Which is obviously complete horseshit, but unfortunately that same excuse has been working for his other fascist orders such as the deportations to CECOT.
Math doesn’t change, we just learn more about it.
Isn’t that true of almost all the sciences?
Yeah, if the “surgery” was having your organs harvested. And you’re awake enough to feel the pain and observe the horror of what’s happening, but without enough strength to stop it.
51·2 months agoWhy can’t the world have more of this and less of… everything else that’s going on right now? 😕
I don’t really have a point, it’s just sad that humans have the capacity to do such cool, fun, creative things, and instead we’re burning the world down so computers can churn out garbage and blowing each other up because we’re different from each other.
7·2 months agoThe death of social media is kind of fueling the death of human to human communication.
I understand where you are coming from, but I feel the exact opposite. In my opinion, the rise of social media started the decline of real human connection.
Connection over social media is not a substitute for connection with humans in real life, but a lot of times it feels like it can be. I recently made a very deliberate effort to drastically cut back on my social media usage and instead force myself to go out and build community by participating in local groups and events. I’ve had so many good experiences and made several friends. That feels so much more valuable to me than the hours a day I used to spend doom scrolling.
It’s giving Captain Holt in a red hat energy: https://youtu.be/4heE4Nu_Yik
38·2 months agoI normally hate those bell curve memes, but I couldn’t help myself:
What’s the easiest way to switch instances? I didn’t know any of this. I just wanted to get away from reddit and still engage with communities focused on my hobbies… 😔