Boss makes two-ninety, I make a cent

I’m gonna lace his coffee with fent

Oh crap!

I checked, and I’ve made one comment there (deleted by mods). Sorry XD

Doesn’t G have an insulated portion so live conductor is never exposed?

I have a more comprehensive set than that, and I still keep all of the freebies

Birds are not real unreal!

Too poor, I’m either working or dying

It’s clearly Dorf

Sometimes I’ll post a picture straight from a duckduckgo search, and it doesn’t work without the stuff after the ?

(I’m also not sure how long the url is valid for, so I try not to do this too often)

Yeah, but then she might kill herself

Bove deez nuts

Beautiful 👏

He did, the room says “WOOD”

C’mon you apes, you wanna live forever?

Flash bulb circuit on a disposable camera

Waaay worse than a wall outlet

That’s an excellent point

That’s because they’re not looking for evidence that shows a crime was committed, they’re looking for evidence of who committed the crime

Your injuries are evidence of a crime, but not necessarily evidence of a specific perpetrator

When a woman claims to have been assaulted, I automatically believe her in regards to how I treat her.

As far as the person she’s accused goes, though, I think it’s pretty easy to understand that nobody should be convicted on the sole evidence of their accuser’s testimony, and I think that should apply to the court of public opinion as well.

It’s a situation where either one person is guilty of a horrible crime, or the other is making false allegations of said crime. In order for both to be “innocent until proven guilty”, you need to assume the allegations are true when interacting with the woman, and assume they’re false while interacting with the accused. It’s really counterintuitive and maybe impossible to do

The fuzzy part is XD