The customer is a Fae

Clanker (because LLMs don’t actually have feelings and shouldn’t be anthropomorphized)

Taco probably won’t do it anyways

Am I out of touch? No, its the faculty who are wrong.

Safety concerns aside, you should trust your partner enough to not need to track them

The tracking happens even with a big reflector/scatterer on your head, but as long as you dont wear it regularly, the system would have difficulty identifying you from wave propagation alone

Ironically, a tin foil hat would probably work to prevent that kind of surveillance

Big AI companies pretty much exclusively sell LLMs that output unreliable data, so idk how much of a worry it is anymore.

Another interesting deterrent is to poison unruly scrapers with infinite nonsense via Markov chains https://algorithmic-sabotage.github.io/asrg/trapping-ai/

I wonder what the success rate is if you verify using AI generated faces (assuming they cheap out and you dont have to provide camera access)

A modern day Don Quixote

Sounds like something a woke person would say

Not if Anduril or Palantir go anywhere near it

We’ll need a private-watching private to stand guard

They will need to start banning PIs that abuse the system with AI slop and waste reviewers’ time. Just a 1 year ban for the most egregious offenders is probably enough to fix the problem

He was vibe-coding in production. Am I reading that right? Sounds like an intern-level mistake.

Raw-dogging the internet without an adblocker is about as irresponsible as not using contraception

Meta is a security threat outside of Russia too. No privacy should be expected when using their services

People who don’t use LLMs to write code:

You guys are paying for a website, rather than just buying a physical dictionary?