• 3 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 15th, 2025

help-circle



  • That lesson was always the point of monopoly of course:

    The game is named after the economic concept of a monopoly—the domination of a market by a single entity. The game is derived from The Landlord’s Game, created in 1903 in the United States by Lizzie Magie, as a way to demonstrate that an economy rewarding individuals is better than one where monopolies hold all the wealth.[1][6] It also served to promote the economic theories of Henry George—in particular, his ideas about taxation.[7] The Landlord’s Game originally had two sets of rules, one with tax and another on which the current rules are mainly based.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_(game)


  • a14o@feddit.orgtoLinux@lemmy.mlOkay why is your distro the best?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Same for me. I distro-hopped for about 20 years with OpenSuse, Ubuntu, Debian, Arch and Fedora being the most memorable desktop setups for me. While all that was a valuable experience, NixOS feels like graduation.

    For the Nix-curious: I wish someone would have told me not to bother with the classic config and build a flake-based system immediately. They’re “experimental” in name only, very stable and super useful in practice.



  • We’re talking about intelligence here, a concept that comes with a lot of baggage, so I agree that it’s good to be precise. Critical thinking skills and good decision-making is definitely part of what I meant when I posted my comment.

    In my opinion, your use of the term is in danger of

    1. essentializing intelligence: “This fascist may have a good education and specialized skills, but they are not in and of themselves intelligent.” I think it’s better to think of intelligence as a contingent and situational social effect rather than as an inherent property of a person.
    2. becoming a tautology: “Intelligent people could never support this, therefore I know that all fascists are stupid.” This type of argument just dosn’t hold.

    The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced that fascism appeals to the uneducated and unintelligent, but it would be a mistake to reduce it to a function of intellect, or an “ideology of the stupid”. There’s plenty of dangerous, sincere fascists who are quite intelligent in all useful meanings of the word.



  • Last weekend a friend told me that they’re involved in an activist group that focuses on political education for people with learning disabilities and severe mental health issues. The activists’ reasoning is that this group of people is very susceptible to fascist narratives, and prone to social isolation when they start adopting or simply repeating fascist world views.

    Fascists of course have no trouble claiming that support as validation for their politics, and votes are votes, after all. One could even argue that fascist propaganda inherently targets people with reduced intellectual capabilities.

    This post made me think of that.