Nah, they all get what they want. The world is saved, the idiot got the final blow and is hailed as a hero, the manipulator swindled a massive reward for their efforts, and the second idiot ate the reward. Or, more likely, the campaign falls apart long before they get to that bit.
The warrior went on a noble, world-saving quest, and they joined up with two idiots and a manipulator. Sounds like he’s not even smart enough to realise he’s also an idiot.
Meanwhile, the manipulator teamed up with three idiots, who she can probably manipulate easily. She’s going places.
Considering the guy leading the Republicans, I feel like they would say that about ALL babies.
On the one hand, this leaves Karlach as Scrappy, and I don’t want that. On the other hand, Karlach would absolutely be Scrappy.
No need for wordplay? What community do you think you’re in?
It’s impressive how most of these right-wing nuts have been complying with this order for decades already.
He can’t post to that community anyway. He got instance banned.
The original Megamind would still be there. It’s like how you can still watch a good version of Snow White if you want.
In the Supergirl tv show, there’s a hero called Dreamer. Basically, the powers are passed down from mother to daughter, and while everyone accepts Dreamer as a girl, they’re surprised when she inherits the powers and not her sister.
I read that as ffmpreg, and I thought it was some new ao3 trope where two girls impregnate a guy or something.
Okay, but think about this: Groofy.
As soon as I typed that, I changed my mind. No longer defending groof.
What do you mean “reduced”? Do you think he was ever more than a crook?
How does signing in prove you’re not a bot? Do they not know how many bot accounts there are?
“Let them eat less cake”
Very kind of you to imply the guy has ever “been”.
no interest in people who behave like babies.
You have no interest in yourself?
No, they definitely asked the wrong question. If they ask “how can I do [thing]”, it assumes it’s possible to do [thing]. But if they can’t do [thing], the question is invalid, and there is no correct answer.
Honestly, the way you put it, it’s like they don’t actually want to fix the problem. They just want their solution to be right. Anyone who doesn’t tell them what they want to hear is the REAL problem, even if what they want to hear is a lie.
Do you want me to lie?
See, that’s the point of the XY problem. They asked the wrong question.
Playing Dragon Age in D&D simply would not work. Even after a significant amount of effort, you’d either end up with something entirely unlike Dragon Age or something that barely resembles D&D. So I have to tell them “no” or I’m lying. And if someone stops listening and considers me hostile because I’m not willing to lie to them, then it’s absolutely on them.
Why just one side? Keep pushing it in until he can feel both sides.
I fully believe this guy has no idea how horrific the things he’s boasting about actually are.