Wow, I didn’t think there would be so many crazy psychos in the comments.

I can get that people might not feel as much empathy with animals than humans (get, not approve) but most of the comments are kitten-drowning level.

You get a pet, which is supposed to be a companion and basically part of your family, and you don’t mind them being torn to shreds?

Okay then, I guess if your kid has a terminal cancer we can also feed him to the tiger? After all in the end it’s just a bunch of meat.

My point is that cigarettes are stupidly legal, so having asbestos allowed to be put in them despite the knowledge of its health effects doesn’t seem much more absurd.

And how many banned cigarettes?

The real surprise is that it didn’t become the norm, and still legal as long as it has a little warning on the pack, while in the meantime useful medical drugs are banned as “potentially risky”

Messy code by humans generally isn’t logical because it went through multiple modifications/deletions that are not visible anymore.

I’m not sure that bad devs are much better than AIs, and they’re the ones using them to code now. I think the problem stems from not giving a shit about code making sense, and AIs just increase the problem.

I mean, I saw code that was essentially saying things like “if True == False” and when asking about what the purpose of the block was to the original dev (who wasn’t even such a bad dev), they just had no idea. Humans are chaotic and nonsensical and messy code comes from that, not from a weird logic, and you can’t comprehend it most of the times because it’s a mix of confusion, lack of planning, mistakes and laziness.

Non

I face the same level of confusion when people like both of these shows, as when people complain star trek “became” woke.

“Un violeur décide de la loi en France”

Yeah let’s not listen to this piece of shit, or this piece of shit government, okay?

Fascism is growing. New communication media are allowing for large scale, in-depth brainwashing.

People now strive more than ever to be part of the “norm” and eliminate all the rest. Capitalism keeps everyone so busy and self-centered that morals disappear. “Charismatic leaders” spearhead the new trends in a sect/religion approach.

It’s not stupidity of the masses. It’s an engineered death spiral, where the stupid people are the ones engineering it thinking that if it’s good for them, it is good.

Du coup c’est toujours antisémite quand ça vient pas de la gauche ?

“My life is easy so then everyone who isn’t in my situation must be lazy”

So they drew dicks on the doors?

Je dis pas qu’il faudrait la virer, je dis que l’article encourage l’idée qu’un étranger mérite de se faire dégager à moins de “prouver sa valeur”, ce qui est dégueulasse.

Ouais en fin le titre à coup de “quel endroit est encore sur de nos jours” montre une intention très assumée de créer un sentiment d’insécurité afin d’encourager les idées sécuritaires d’extreme droite.

C’est manipulteur, c’est intentionnel, et la justesse des chiffres n’a aucun impact dans tout ça. La raclure de merde qu’est Zemmour a fait toute sa propagande sur des chiffres (parfois) exacts, ça n’en reste pas moins manipulateur et ça ne devrait pas être propagé.

J’ai un peu de mal avec ce genre d’articles.

Il y a un peu un sous entendu du “on lui dit de partir alors qu’elle est bien, elle”.

Je pense pas que ça soit normal qu’on dégage des gens sauf motif grave, mais au lieu de se focaliser là dessus l’article insiste sur le fait qu’elle soit “respectable”, ait réussi ses études, etc.

Ça veut dire quoi, que si elle était juste une sale immigrée sans diplomes ça serait moins grave ?

J’ai un peu l’impression qu’on est toujours sur la pente glissante où on détermine ce qu’est un “bon” ou “mauvais” étranger, et l’empathie est là ou non en fonction.

Avec cette logique, Trump fait rien de mal, il garde les bons étrangers et dégage les mauvais, aussi, il a juste des critères un peu différents (mais pas tant que ça quand on y pense).

Du coup ça c’est ok, mais dire à un nazi de se taire c’est une atteinte à la liberté d’expression

Then all hope is lost and there is absolutely no point in fighting, all it will do is annoy people who try to read your messages.

If writing weird can have an impact on the world, I’m sure a lot of other things can too.

That moment when you are so deep into capitalist shit you start making motivational quotes not about talent, morals or well-being, but about money.

You really need to reach a deep and pathetic level of stupidity to actually believe something like that

Or just a vain attempt at stopping a tornado by blowing on it.

Laws are what are needed, not writing weird.