• 3 Posts
  • 295 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 29th, 2024

help-circle



  • White-washing genocide, supporting authoritarian regimes and ethnic cleansings, making comical, truly degenerate claims (“North Korea is a great place to live and there is a BIA conspiracy to discredit manpig leader”) has nothing to do with moderation practises.

    We both know you and other tankie roaches are merely engaging in online roleplay. You almost don’t speak any other languages and have never lived in another country.

    And yet you constantly chimp out with ridiculous claims and clear demagoguery.

    Even your chimp outs against what Americans call liberals is performative and stupid.







  • The title and framing is misleading.

    There are other comparable examples with indirect cultural (even ethnic) links where no one in their right mind would call it anti-[ethnicity/relation/culture/social group].

    Honestly, anti-semintism is way over used. There is of course real anti-semitism, but these days it is increasingly becoming a polemical device to try and shut down legitimate criticism and actions.

    If you want your country to drop diplomatic recognition of Israel, is that anti-Semitism?

    I would argue it is not anti-Semitism. If you have any connection (ethnic links, multi year exposure) to a country that has suffered from colonialism, you will have a different perspective.

    Opposition to “British Burma” is not discrimination or hatred of UK. It’s wanting to manage your own country.









  • The primary enabler of Israeli crimes is the American public. Not every single person of course, from my time living in the US, both the local far right and centre right are complicit.

    Realisticly, the best way forward would be to end the recognition of the Israel colonialist regime, ban all economic, logistical and communication links and start catching and prosecuting war criminals.

    But for most countries, this is not possible, since America will annihilate you economically if you take such actions.

    And the responsibility for this lies with the American public. And this includes the centre right.



  • But you do take any scepticism of A16Z as an immediate sign that one is a “purity obsessed leftist”. This is not reasonable.

    OK, so you are saying that I started lying in this thread, I actually believe substack is full of Nazis, but I decided to temporarily back down from this view in order to try and “win” this discussion.

    You can agree that substack is not full of Nazis and it’s a viable platform, while also recognising that they are an American tech company that received money from a VC firm that is commited to authoritarianism, corruption and criminal schemes.

    What’s your logic here? I am genuinely curious.

    You are ranting against “left orthodoxy on purity”, yet you yourself are demanding acceptance of A16Z specifically.