Sidhean

“If you don’t have anything nice to say, that’s no longer freedom of speech.”

–John Halo

When the censoring is diegetic.

I can’t believe a ‘rightist’ made art of the Right weaponizing the phrase “hate speech”! That’s pretty cool! :3

“Dead guys wife is hot. Kids, too.”

You’d be unironically compiling the New Bible. Conservatives love that kind of condescending, unfiltered hate

If you were beating your kids loud enough for me to hear, I’d hope they’d be taken away, too!

Israel’s foreign ministry said it categorically rejected the report and called for the COI to be abolished. Israel’s ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Daniel Meron, called the report a scandalous and fake “libellous rant” that had been authored by “Hamas proxies”. Israel has declined to cooperate with the COI, accusing it of having a political agenda.

Google “Notch, the creator of Minecraft”

“standing up to Iran”

LMAO I did the same thing. Can you tell I’m a US citizen?

Funny, the victim is no better than the perpetrator. How perfectly conservative.

“Oh heck- I’m supposed to be meeting her there now!” Awkward way to be reminded, but thats what partners are for!

No.

Yes.

You see, memes are destroying the fabric of our reason and debate. It’s time to stop laughing and start thinking

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER

Ah fuck, this makes sense. I was against the “outlaw” bit but (as a US citizen) I think I’m seeing things a little skewed. I cede its an important step to preventing this kind of thing (a little late lmao) :(

That’s how wars work, yeah. Someone attacks someone else, that person fights back, everyone condemns the defender and decries “both sides! Wah wah! Their defending themselves, how violent!”

I appreciate you retreating to a more defensible mott. Swaying public opinion on a matter as a professional in a relevant field is allowing personal views through a professional mask, so we can agree that was an issue regardless.

Look, if this hypothetical person can control their Conservative urges enough to read modern science pertaining to their job and then act on it, and NOT act on their own beliefs, then i suppose, in a hypothetical modern, very accepting world in which this ignorance doesn’t fester into fascism and in which all grievances are addressed fairly and fully, i suppose you might have some vague philosophical point and it wouldn’t be irresponsible.

It seems incredibly naive to assume that no professionals personal views conflict with work place stances.

“Suck it. If you wanna be a facist pos i’ll fight you over it.”

see? like that. you don’t have to actually be a nazi, or advocate for them. If you think its reasonable to fight only against peaceful people, and that violent people should always get their way (lest we ourselves resort to violence (egads!)). I’m not sure I agree.