Macron trying to legitimise his dictatorship (he gave the power to form a government to a party whose leaders he’s friends with that achieved only 5% of the vote) and garner sorely needed votes for the next election.

I don’t think you’re seeing the connection you’re making. What I’m saying is why should a socializing skill be a requirement to have friends? That is a basic human need, not something you should have to exercise for.

When you watch Enemy at the Gates and need to correct shit for longer than the movie runtime.

It’s a software issue rather than OS. Too many programs and websites can’t handle webp.

We can’t just mass execute the people who voted Trump into office.

Why not? Obviously you can’t execute tens of millions of voters. But you could execute party members and those who were active during his presidencies and other supporters within or without the party.

That’s the whole issue with how radical is used as a negative term, even slur, by media and establishment politics.

Even nowadays media and “experts” are warning that the youth radicalising is bad.

The truth is, radicalism itself isn’t bad. Quite the opposite. It’s only bad when it falls on the right side of the political spectrum, i.e. fascism or religious radicalism like Christian nationalism or Islamism.

This concept doesn’t apply here. Democrats aren’t on the left. Liberals are not a part of leftist infighting or lack thereof.

I am saying that because it seemed to me like you’re implying people need to learn and train their socializing skills, even when it’s not in their nature.

Keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better.

As you righties say “facts don’t care about your feelings”.

So you’re saying the Ukrainians who lived in Eastern part of Ukraine are all Russians? Or do you need to confirm who is and isn’t with some racial purity test?

Everything I’ve said is factual, not Russian propaganda.

You know what really is ironic? That you libtards call anything you disagree with Russian propaganda and then turn around and spread Western propaganda.

But liberals are just too stupid to ever realize that. You will get your reckoning one day.

Ich denke das Hauptproblem ist ein anderes, neben der persönlichen Erfüllung oder der wirtschaftlichen Lage und der Zukunft der Welt, welche vergleichsweise geringer ausschlaggebend sind.

Für Kinder braucht es 2 Personen. Alleine geht das schlecht.

Why would you require a good socializing skill though? Making this some requirement doesn’t seem to solve any issue. Just let people be the way they are. They should still be able to have friends.

A topic that has been discussed before, but not way enough and no solution has been reached.

The death of third spaces.

That’s what you get from Von der Leyen. A traitorous failed politician who should have crashed out of her career in politics a decade ago.

Proton did not only hand over data to the Swiss courts, but the French courts via that. They didn’t just comply with national laws, but those of other countries.

That contradicts their virtue signalled interest in privacy, when they’re willing to surrender any data without even putting up a fight. They did not even try to argue in courts against handing over private data. And considering this lead to the arrest of the activist, it either obviously wasn’t encrypted or Proton had the means to decrypt it on their end.

You can’t just link Proton’s own PR speak as a source to counter that. Of course they would defend themselves.

It’s not about the law, but what’s right to me.

Proton according to this post is virtue signalling. Claiming one thing, then doing the other.

Yummy data

I know this is about buying European, but piracy is still more moral.

Subscriptions are evil, American or European. Piracy and ownership are good.

No so does France. Proton helped convict a French environmental activist by providing the courts full access to their private proton account.