It was predicted in 79. It is in no way a Tory accident.

This whole argument is flawed.

If reform can be a serious risk to Tory and labour. So can a left of labour party.

The whole argument reform is a risk. Cannot sit with only labour can ever win.

More so labour is the newer of our 2 party leaders. Others can come and have.

Yes and know. I remember many rejecting Corbyn for not ignoring Brexit. The party members were very split over the subject.

How can the left split more. Most will not vote labour. Only a few did this time,

This is not more splitting, it is the left trying to find a party that gives the slitest shit about them

Can we crowd fund an artist. To find a spot he must pass by on the way to the pa Ace. Find a mice wall. Any paint a huge baby tromp getting a blow job from Starmer.

Well he lost two elections with more voter then Keith won one.

But he seems unable to accept he only won. Because more people opposed hi opponents then him. Trying gain from those voters rather then the ones refusing to vote for him. Is just lazy.

Not to mention a desperate attempt to ignore democracy. And much of his own party. His current anti migraint negativity. And disability discrimination. Dose not have a strong following in his party members.

Then your government openly breaking laws. And ignoring your constitution. With zero consequences. Yes.

The only way to fight unjustified laws, between elections is to be arrested.

Share a pic. We want to compare 5yo you.

We won’t laugh. Well we won’t admit we’re Laughing our arses off.

He will lose elections before taking such hints.

PLP may not let him get that far. But honestly, he has removed enough non-loyal. Even that is far from probable.

If the UK, left wants a left of centre party. Unifying around another one is the only option. But given the lefts refusal to unify. And the main parties love of FPTP. Next election, a Tory reform coalition is looking most likely. Followed by a divergence towards far right ideals for the next few decades.

While 60% of voters, from centre of left. Are totally ignored.

Also important to remember.

Since privatisation. Water companies have sold of 30 reservoirs for development. Without replacing them.

Our current shortages exist purely because, water companies took the spare storage, and stole the investment funds to pay share holders.

Climate change is real. But summer water shortages are not related.

Has never been a “bar”.

Only a rallying call. And given it excludes many on benefits/unemployed etc. These are people with the most experienced of how society works when things fail. In this modern age. It is far from an inclusive call.

That said. Age has always been more about experience and education. Today’s 16 yo is way more educated in world events. Then any 1800s adult. And more so then even in the 80s when I was 16.

The internet leads to some negatives. But things are Def different now.

UK yes. As long as controlled.

Exactly. No matter the y dimension. Barcode data is only stored in x. Whereas QR uses x and y for data.

They also use the corner squares and a few specific dots to allow scanning from greater angles. Basically allowing the data to be read in 3d space. Even though only 2d is used to store that data.

This is why QR can work well with cameras. Whereas bar codes are designed for very short range laser reflection.

PS lots of info on QR online including open source programs to make your own.

The same goes for bar codes. But readers involve some very simple maker skills. Making simple barcode readers was a common school science project in the early 90s.

Repeat offenders and unlicensed drivers happen here as well. But the use of cameras makes it much harder then the past.

But having lived in the US. Most of it has so little public transport not driving is impossible. Here it is doable in all but the most remote areas. Just crap compared to the 80s and before. It is still way better the most cities in the US.

Not really the question.

My opinion (and it is just that) is based on Corbyn response to being attached to the party. He dose not seem interested in being a front runner again.

Plus there are at least 40 current labour MPs who may move over before the next election. A new name without his media history is likely exactly what is needed ATM.

When has any global standard ever been elected. What process even exists to do so.

The whole idea that some other nation gaining power post ww2 being more democratic is just crap

The pre WW2 world was far from some democratic ideal. The US just took over from Europe’s fiscal control using exactly the same techniques. Just as the UK took over from Spain etc.

Is it shitty yes. But the idea that if any of these nations sat back. Some peaceful agreement between waring nations would have evolved. Is just fantasy. It is looking back with a modern mindset that simply did not exist in any power regime at the time.

I’d be very surprised if Corbyn leads this new party.

Well yes. That is why it was respected. America used it’s delayed entry to build it’s reduction capability. Used that to help win. Then not having exhausted it took advantage.

But while correct. It’s a more accurate way of saying the doller was respected. As a strong trade currency other nations could use.

As that is very clearly happening. And has been since the 90s

Doing as UKip and now reform are doing. Is really the only way to slow it down.

Edit: I’ll add. The UK has a history of replacing a big party under FPTP.

Post WW2 the labour party did it to the Liberal party. Politics was divided very like now. At the time the UK overton window had never really considered socialism.

The 2 main parties are moving the same way. With reform pulling the Tories to the extreme right. Nothing pulling labour away.

If the left can actually come together to support a single left of centre party. It can either pull labour left. Or replace them. Just as reform is threatening to do with the Tories.

Countries that value financial sovereignty.

Keep it by storing a tradeable reserve in other currencies. And or gold and silver but that has become less common.

The doller has won purely because it is respected around the world. Because most nations have some desire to trade with the US.

As that desire weakens sovereignty or your own currency is less strong if you are holding less stable currencies. And the doller is looking less and less stable every time trump talks.