Don Piano

Some other ways:

-Take a piece of paper and a pencil and draw it, take a picture of the drawing

-Find a picture of a tree and toilets and paste them onto each other in paint, paint.net, krita, or whatever

Even if it looks like shit, it’ll still:

-look better

-be better

-make you better at it

Oh, ich dachte das waer so ein Geraet mit dem man Stahlpfosten durch Asphalt in die Erde rammen kann.

“i have to think about this one.” what

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01106-6

Abstract: “Aspects of modern society, such as artificial lighting and rigid schedules, create ‘social jetlag’ — a mismatch between biological chronotypes and societal demands. This circadian misalignment particularly affects evening chronotypes, leading to sleep deprivation, mental health issues and physical disorders. Flexible schedules and environmental modifications could restore natural sleep patterns and improve well-being.”

Hey, es ist nicht nur verschwenderisch, es ist ausserdem auf vielfaeltige Weisen schaedlich und extrem nervig. Akademische Arbeit z.B. ist teils massiv negativ bettoffen.

Killing and reversing are different levels of difficult.

Ich glaub die Frage bezog sich aufs Schweizerische.

They provide a reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104638

Ach, das ist schon ein Ziel bei google, nennt sich zero click search.

Vermutlich Kontext bzw halt das Wort hat nur eine Variante, weiss es aber selbst nicht. :D

Schweizerdeutsch hat kein ß

Landmilch im Morgenkaffee

Oh fuck, mein Beileid. <3

That’s a more realistic analogy, but my point here isn’t that autism is not a multidimensional and continuously distributed trait. My point is only that a spectrum and dichotomized group membership are technically conceivable, even if substantively absurd.

There’s a conceivable reality where you have a spectrum of autistic traits, but whether someone is autistic is a strict binary. Imagine a lamp that can have any color, but that is either turned on or off. This would be quite funky, because there’d have to be some sort of mechanism that causes strict grouping - something you see in psychology maybe sometimes in sequence learning research and some types of reasoning research, but otherwise is quite rare.

However, this is obviously not reality.

There’s people with more pronounced autistic traits and those with less pronounced ones. There isn’t half an autist, but there can be someone whose autistic traits’ intensities are near the middle of those of a person who clearly is autistic and those of a person who clearly isn’t.

The categorical nature of diagnoses does not reflect the underlying phenomena, it reflects arguments about healthcare resource allocation. The actual phenomena are more nuanced

Narcissism is a somewhat multidimensional trait with gradients of intensity. Who told you that it’s a binary classification?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346546680_Untangling_the_associations_that_narcissistic_admiration_and_narcissistic_rivalry_have_with_agency_communion_and_romantic_commitment/figures?lo=1

24 km/h, give or take

Yup

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weber–Fechner_law

DAS