Not a single human being in sight

-“Fuck yeah.”

(just in case)

I push my fingers into my eyes.

Look at the aristocrat, just casually mentioning their cocktail!

After low hanging jeans, the new fashion style filtering out from jails to public will be sharpened toothbrush shivs. But hey, at least your kitchen knives will be nice and round tipped.

And just like that, having been freed from the Soviet grasp in 1989, they enjoyed three decades before spooning again with the Russians, seemingly having forgotten their imperialist goals - led by none other than the guy who was the loudest activist against the Soviets in 1989. This really feels like that fawn-in-the-pool meme.

I keep returning to Numberphile from time to time, and I think I have missed this before, so thanks for the stuff, it surely sounds interesting!

Or my favourite trope from the mid to late 90’s: guessing the password. But not everyone can do that; they need a hacker for that.

My friend’s mom occasionally gives full names, like forename+surname and uses them as such

While basically everything is pointing at that (and basically everyone knows, including even some MAGAts), there is no hard evidence for that at the moment, and if a newspaper mentions such a serious claim they could be sued for that. Now, unfortunately, “but come on, Mr. Judge, we all know that” is both true and unfortunately insufficient for defense. I guess that’s part of the reason they didn’t use his entire face, and they can say it’s just someone whose eyes look similar (it might even be the case, and they might reveal the entire photo). You could also say the smaller letter text under it is unrelated. I guess there is a reason they didn’t mention his name in the big text one, either.

Honestly, even if they got their hands on the Epstein files, a single name entry in a list of invitees might not be sufficient for sentencing him, since simply being there doesn’t immediately mean that you’ve done anything to minors by existing in that location. It is a great material to start a legal process or an investigation, but unless there is an actual photo, video or someone’s confession in it, it won’t stand on its own.

I guess it’s just closer to the center, and it would have been weird in place of the T.

This is giving me serious Who finds a friend finds a treasure vibes.

It’s similar to scam emails with butchered spelling. It’s there to filter out the ones with two working brain cells and only target the absolutely clueless audience.

Laden retriever…?

A chain with a 9kg bell weight.

I totally agree with how awful this is to the environment, but should this really be in /c/memes?

They want a backdoor to your emails while terrorism has been clear as day and they still haven’t done anything about it in Gaza.

While I never heard that saying before, I can totally get behind it. I truly appreciate it, thanks.

Wow. Do you know the feeling when someone brings your attention to something that you had been ignoring pretty much all your life, and from that point it drives you mad every single time? Yeah, you have just done that with the meant to/supposed to thing. You’re SO totally right! Aaaand you cursed me.

Oh no (yes?), I totally get what you’re saying, and I’m able to process these situations (I think I’ve seen enough during that 15-20 years of playing with/against kids), that part doesn’t bother me; what I was really curious about is how you, personally, would interpret that brief response, without any prior context.