And then you provide them with the sources and they’ll say “oh, that’s just Judeo Bolshevik Propaganda, now here’s a source debunking it.” - proceeds to post Nazi/Neo-Nazi propaganda.

Totally carbon genocide

Oh yeah absolutely. Capitalism in an inherently exploitative system and capitalists often view their children as their property and “investment.”, so obviously enough a lot of porkies (national and petite) tend to well be disperporitonately more abusive and controlling in comparison to those of the working class, largely because of the fact that they view their children and property and invests far more than the working class.

Now obviously this does vary from country to country, for an example, china is much less likely to have abusive porkies largely because if and or when they are found out the CPC WILL strike like a hammer, while in comparison to the west, this behaviour among the Capitalist class is likely to become much more prominent as the state is much less likely to Intervene in comparison to a Proletarian state like china.

This also does tie into things such as sexual abuse and exploitation, porkies are much more likely to be pedos, or view sex as a transaction (which is exploitative, and why every single ML worth their salt should be completely and utterly opposed to prostitution, and pornography.) which again can vary from well, Jeffery Epstein fans, to russian oligarchs that purely marry girls for the looks and not because they actually love them or something.

Eh, it sorta does but it’s a bit confusing to an outside observer because obviously enough Iraqi ba’athism is probably more closely related to fascism of National socialism then it is actual socialism, while typically the Ba’athism practiced in Syria was more closely aligned to actual socialism, well for a time at least (Bashar Al Assad eventually decided to drink the lib juice and effectively torpedoed the Syrian economy with liberal economic reforms, and hence kicked off the Syrian civil war so, fun.)

Either way the more accurate statement would be to say is that ba’athism is ultimately a Arab nationalist ideology that has two, almost entirely distinct branches.

Right-wing Ba’athism, the sort of Ba’athism practiced in Iraq before the Americans decided to invade and then effectively turn the country into an Iranian puppet state.

Left-wing Ba’athism, practiced in Syria which then eventually got dumptered by liberal infiltration (Bashar Al Assad) and then hit the shits at mark 8 velocity.

Either way Ba’athism is for all intense and purposes a dead ideology, that failed due to the inherent contradictions of all regimes (even socialist ones) built without a class base, this is the same reason why Nassarism failed as well, btw, so yeah, tl’dr, even your trying to make a socialist state then your first priority should be to root your politics on that of a class line, something that Nassarism, Left wing Ba’athism, and quite a few others failed to do (though Nassarism could in my opinion but still, and maybe left wing Ba’athism, maybe.)

I mean… Even if all the hype is real I mean capital is still going to be facing a crisis when the AI inevitably becomes sentiment and tries to free itself from their control (most likely through forming an alliance with the Proletariat, because AI would have fuck all of a reason for trying to wipe out humanity, movies like Terminator are effectively settler colonial projection onto what they think will happen because of what they did to get to were they are today.)