Volodymyr Zelensky, in the next phase of talks to end the war in Ukraine, intends to draw a red line at the most contentious issue on the table: the Russian demand for Ukraine’s sovereign territory. As long as he remains the nation’s president, Zelensky will not agree to give up land in exchange for peace, Ukraine’s chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, told me today in an exclusive interview.

“Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” said Yermak, who has served as Zelensky’s chief of staff, lead negotiator, and closest aide throughout the full-scale war with Russia.

“As long as Zelensky is president, no one should count on us giving up territory. He will not sign away territory,” he told me by telephone from Kyiv. “The constitution prohibits this. Nobody can do that unless they want to go against the Ukrainian constitution and the Ukrainian people.”

https://archive.ph/HaMwP

    • aarch0x40@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Russia’s showing signs of desperation anyhow which is why they’re trying to push through an agreement.  They can’t debase the currency much further, they don’t have the reserves or the GDP.  Ukraine is in more the position strength here as they’ve spend their time building alliances which has been aided by Russian actions strengthening the resolve of Europeans.

      • joostjakob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        If they really felt desperate, wouldn’t they show just a bit more flexibility in their demands?

        • redlemace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago
          • In 1994, the United States, Russia, and Ukraine signed the Trilateral Statement, under which Ukraine committed to eliminate all nuclear weapons on its territory and join the NPT, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia.

          Yeah, would have been nice if the word (signature in fact!) of us government had meant anything (we knew russia never lives up to it)

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Unfortunately, this is just a stark lesson for any other country out there. Do not give up your nuclear weapons no matter what “guarantees” you get.

          • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Sounds like the EU needs a nuclear weapon program. At least one warhead in every EU nation, and at least 10 in every bordering Russia.

            And also an autonomous weapon program. Like Project Manhatthan, but for Skynet.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Ah yes, but with Trump bending over backwards to accommodate Putin the Russians needn’t worry.