WTF are you talking about now? There is NO argument. I’ve been following your comments, and you’re a fucking nazi enabler, despite the clear evidence of their criminal behaviour. And anyone who enables nazi’s, is a nazi too !
Grow up instead of doubling down, you chud!
From the get-go here I’ve been working really hard to try and avoid dehumanizing anyone involved in this video, only for you to come along and slap me with a label that allows you and every single one of your “friends” to dehumanize me instead.
I said you are a nazi, because you support nazi’s. I would NEVER want a defective like yourself to “join me”, you disgusting sea lion! You are probably ICE scum yourself!
(Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[5][6][7][8] It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”,[9] and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings…)
I had fun toying with you but you aren’t open to facts or learning, so I’ll not waste any more of my time on you, Nazi. Now get yourself well and truly lost, you weirdo! If you are indeed ICE, you will pay one day.
Ad hominem (Latin for ‘to the person’), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent’s character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is “A” makes a claim of “fact”, to which “B” asserts that “A” has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence “B” concludes that “A” has their “fact” wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate.
WTF are you talking about now? There is NO argument. I’ve been following your comments, and you’re a fucking nazi enabler, despite the clear evidence of their criminal behaviour. And anyone who enables nazi’s, is a nazi too ! Grow up instead of doubling down, you chud!
Words, words, words
Keep telling yourself that, nazi ! Then you don’t need to look at yourself and see how foul and ugly your kind really is.
From the get-go here I’ve been working really hard to try and avoid dehumanizing anyone involved in this video, only for you to come along and slap me with a label that allows you and every single one of your “friends” to dehumanize me instead.
Who’s really being ugly here?
Work harder at something more moral, ethical and honest, crying nazi !
So you’re saying, as long as I join you in dehumanizing the right people (i.e. those you point at and call Nazis), I will appear moral in your eyes?
How exactly is this any different to what you accuse ICE of doing?
I said you are a nazi, because you support nazi’s. I would NEVER want a defective like yourself to “join me”, you disgusting sea lion! You are probably ICE scum yourself!
(Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[5][6][7][8] It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”,[9] and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings…)
I had fun toying with you but you aren’t open to facts or learning, so I’ll not waste any more of my time on you, Nazi. Now get yourself well and truly lost, you weirdo! If you are indeed ICE, you will pay one day.
Ad hominem (Latin for ‘to the person’), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent’s character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is “A” makes a claim of “fact”, to which “B” asserts that “A” has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence “B” concludes that “A” has their “fact” wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate.