I don’t think they were writing in a strictly linear timeline and it appears events of the times were included through free association moreso than any duty to chronology.
That said, it leaves a lot to inference and guesswork at the intent or point they were trying to make.
I don’t think they were writing in a strictly linear timeline and it appears events of the times were included through free association moreso than any duty to chronology.
That said, it leaves a lot to inference and guesswork at the intent or point they were trying to make.
Playing fast and lose with chronology when discussing history does not inspire confidence.
No, no it does not.