• piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The 8088 was produce to 1998 and 80186 was produced all the way to 2007.

      They may not been mainstream, but they certainly existed in production to run linux.

      • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Just because they existed during the Linux era doesn’t mean they ran Linux; Torvalds was writing for the 386 from the beginning, and Linux has never been written for anything below 32-bit.

        Now, it certainly has RAN on that hardware through emulation, such as on a 4 bit Intel 4004, but only for the heck of it.

              • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                For one, it explicitly calls itself a “subset”; a subset is not the whole set.

                If we don’t want to go just off the pedantics of language though, then here’s the thing: it was forked a very long time ago, and both have diverged significantly, I think. It’s a bit like saying Blink (the rendering engine of Chromium) is WebKit; sure, Blink is a fork of WebKit, but the two are very different now.

                • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  I mean… obviously 8086 “x86” is more limited than modern x86. So obviously there will be reduced features and divergence.

                  And by your logic, because it diverged 25 years ago… modern linux is…no longer linux.

                  If you want a valid argument, its not GNU/linux since it doesnt use GNU tools…

                  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    To clarify, what I mean is WebKit continued while Blink became its own thing. Factually, Blink is not WebKit anymore.

                    Replace “WebKit” with Linux and Blink with ELKS.