Deceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 days agoobserves your slitimagemessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1525arrow-down119
arrow-up1506arrow-down1imageobserves your slitDeceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 days agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-squaresbird@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·21 days agotop is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
minus-squareLOGIC💣@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·21 days agoOh I see I was overthinking it.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-220 days agoDon’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
minus-squareBjörn@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·21 days agoThough as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·21 days agoDo you mean that they are not as noisy?
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·21 days agoHuh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.
top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
Oh I see I was overthinking it.
Don’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
More noisy.
Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.