RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to cats@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoPikachuimagemessage-square100linkfedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up11.01Karrow-down1imagePikachuRmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to cats@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square100linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squarewintermute@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 months agoThere’s nothing wrong with sunscreen in general, but they are probably referring to what happened recently in Australia: Independent analysis by a trusted consumer advocacy group has found that several of Australia’s most popular, and expensive, sunscreens are not providing the protection they claim to, kicking off a national scandal.
minus-squareLyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoAnd the lab issuing the fake results is based in the US :( …a single US-based laboratory had certified at least half of the products that had failed Choice’s testing, and that this facility routinely recorded high test results. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-04/questions-over-lab-that-tested-sunscreen-spf-claims/105458458
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months ago And the lab issuing the fake results is based in the US :( Of course it is. :(
There’s nothing wrong with sunscreen in general, but they are probably referring to what happened recently in Australia:
And the lab issuing the fake results is based in the US :(
Of course it is. :(