As the U.S. abandons international climate agreements, the EU is hesitating to lead. A once-admired Nordic nation’s backtracking on its climate goals offers clues as to why.
It seems to me that the math in this is overwhelming. If a single person in this minority emits in 90min more than an average person in their lifetime, we should take into consideration that their lifetime is made of many, many, many 90min slots.
Apart from that of course I’m all in for sustainable living and redistribution of wealth for lower classes. Preferably abolish the class-system all together, of course.
I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure. If Jeff Bezoz’s emissions include his ownership share of the emissions by the Amazon corporation (which is a major part of the world’s logistical system at this point), then no doubt, but getting rid of old Jeff wouldn’t eliminate those emissions. I rest my case that half of all fossil fuels in the world aren’t going directly into their jets and yachts.
Yes, sorry I really should’ve sat down and done that to begin with.
Billionaires’ lifestyle emissions dwarf those of ordinary people, but the emissions from their investments are dramatically higher still —the average investment emissions of 50 of the world’s richest billionaires are around 340 times their emissions from private jets and superyachts combined.
Well, there it is.
Edit: If there were 8 billion Amazon corporations, we would’ve shot past Venus a long time ago. The 90 minute mark seems to correspond to this. Getting rid of fifty (number of billionaires examined in the study) superyachts and a hundred 24/7 flying private jets would be next to nothing compared to the emissions from wider economy which they control, but which wouldn’t go away when the guillotine does its thing.
Of course the carbon footprint of the billionaires is nothing compaired to what the industry sector emits. My point was in relation to how the per capita emissions are used, not in comparison to the economy as a whole. While keeping in mind that it’s big oil coined ‘carbon footprints’ to blame us for their greed, so that we focus on personnal choices, instead of collective action.
It seems to me that the math in this is overwhelming. If a single person in this minority emits in 90min more than an average person in their lifetime, we should take into consideration that their lifetime is made of many, many, many 90min slots.
Apart from that of course I’m all in for sustainable living and redistribution of wealth for lower classes. Preferably abolish the class-system all together, of course.
I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure. If Jeff Bezoz’s emissions include his ownership share of the emissions by the Amazon corporation (which is a major part of the world’s logistical system at this point), then no doubt, but getting rid of old Jeff wouldn’t eliminate those emissions. I rest my case that half of all fossil fuels in the world aren’t going directly into their jets and yachts.
If you click on the relevant link above, you will find the report itself. You can even download the methodology note seperately.
Yes, sorry I really should’ve sat down and done that to begin with.
Well, there it is.
Edit: If there were 8 billion Amazon corporations, we would’ve shot past Venus a long time ago. The 90 minute mark seems to correspond to this. Getting rid of fifty (number of billionaires examined in the study) superyachts and a hundred 24/7 flying private jets would be next to nothing compared to the emissions from wider economy which they control, but which wouldn’t go away when the guillotine does its thing.
Of course the carbon footprint of the billionaires is nothing compaired to what the industry sector emits. My point was in relation to how the per capita emissions are used, not in comparison to the economy as a whole. While keeping in mind that it’s big oil coined ‘carbon footprints’ to blame us for their greed, so that we focus on personnal choices, instead of collective action.