• Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    What they’re saying is: “we haven’t called out any specific games, but we told steam if they can’t prove a game is “lawful” well cut them off”.

    That interpretation is inviable because Mastercard is claiming to allow “all” lawful purchases on its network. And, given a purchase is lawful unless proved contrariwise (as a consequence of innocence unless proved guilt), it would need evidence that a purchase is unlawful, in order to prevent it.

    So it’s more than just dictating what can be sold without actually stating it - people there are lying.

    Now the real issue is that at the end of the Mastercard is in a position where this matters and they can influence things. Should work just like cash and leave the government to decide what items are legal/illegal.

    Full agree.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t disagree with you on the first point. I put “unlawful” in quotes to imply that lawful/unlawful is ambiguous and gives Mastercard the cover they need to not really be lying in their statement, even if effectively they are.

      Its corporate doublespeak to a T.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I get that you weren’t disagreeing on the main point. And I think we agree that Mastercard is trying to have the cake and eat it too - it wants to be a censor without being acknowledged as such.