Install Navidrome!

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I loathe Spotify. But blame here falls on the UK government.

      Of course, if Spotify fought this half as hard as they fight Apple…

  • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    How long until my grandparents send their ID and personal info to some scammer because they think they have to?

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Even just getting a picture risks this. It’s so ridiculous. A TOTP code makes so much more sense.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 days ago

    A strange choice given that you don’t even need to have a face to enjoy music.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 days ago

        You say that as if it makes the idea somehow less insane. I hope the billionaire clique pushing this shit has miscalculated and there are still enough people not so far gone that they’re ever going to let the technofascists scan their faces in exchange for the privilege of spending money and being advertised at.

        • Sina@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          There should be strong pushback. You need to be quite insane to let someone scan your face when accessing insert random fetish porn.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re overlooking the question as to exactly who gauges the content to decide whether it’s 18+.

        Song disparaging the autocracy? 18+.

      • libre@badatbeing.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Governments will never understand that resorting to extralegal measures in order to obtain what it is you want and need is due to difficulty in being able to procure it through legal channels, very broadly applicable

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Capitalism will never accept that piracy is the free market voting with it’s wallet, because capitalism is actually not pro-free market

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Capitalism accepts it, thats why corporations lobby for governments to be more aggressive on piracy, while they keep squeezing profits. When governments should just give the corporations the middle finger.

  • WaffleWarrior@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why are we all playing this game? Why not just say screw the UK? Isn’t that easier?

    Or is this just an excuse to up the surveillance and potential ad revanue?

      • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        For some context for Americans, the UK has about the same population as the two most populated US states, California and Texas, combined.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      High-tech western military investments in an age of Russian aggression is actually a good thing to do. And it’s even European instead of US or Israel.

      I see no reason not to fully support this. Sure, a pacifist world would be awesome, but that would require a lot of things to happen that are not realistic at all. The alternative to european defense investments is not peace, it’s death and oppression.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Weapons, but especially digital weapons, will always be turned upon their subordinate populace if it suits the oligarchy

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Perhaps, although when was the last time that happened in the west?

          • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Literally all the time.

            Every major piece of tech in use by police domestically was built originally for military use. Every large police department in the US operates fixed-wing surveillance drones, stingrays/imsi-catchers, camera-based tracking systems, etc. All but the smallest departments receive tons of milsurp vehicles, weapons, and gear. Night vision and thermal imaging systems were military tech, and now they’re standard for police. CS gas was military gear (until it was banned under the Geneva Convention), and now it’s used exclusively by police.

            And that’s just use of military tech against us by police. Get into domestic surveillance by 3-letter agencies, and it’s even worse.

  • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh no! Anyway…

    Honestly Spotify is a terrible company and service, like all streaming. You own nothing. They pay artists peanuts.

    Hope this leads to people buying music and/or supporting artists directly.