• LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Right. I did read the article.

    I just wanted to make clear that that arrested 2 agents and their stated reasons for doing so.

    Are you implying that the SBU was lying about the number of agents arrested?

    What you’ve quoted does not reject what the SBU stated. The headline seems to me to imply corruption in the SBU and instigate distrust. It is not clear.

    • bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s true the headline is unclear. I don’t think the headline implies the SBU being corrupt though. I find it weird though that you would as an explanation pick the formal statements of the SBU which stands accused of overreach in the article. It’s becoming a major problem that often newspapers would just repeat statements by the security services without any further investigation into their claims, and here, where there’s at least a little more info on it, even G7 representatives complaining, you chose to state the official line.