geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 1 month agoBad opticsimagemessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1430arrow-down118
arrow-up1412arrow-down1imageBad opticsgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-230 days agoSo instead of elaborating… you’re just going to meme? I mean sure go ahead, it just feels kinda, idk, pointless. ba-dum tss.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·30 days agoWhat do numbers mean anyways?
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·30 days agoThat’s what I’ve been repeatedly asking you.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·30 days agoSeems to mean that he wasn’t favorable at all.
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-230 days agoWait hangon, is this all because you’re interpreting positive approval of a contentious political figure from 1/3 of a population as not popular?
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·30 days agoYou realize that the figure includes black people right?
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·edit-230 days agoSo… do… they not count?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·edit-230 days agoThe question is optics of the oppressor. When someone tells <oppressed minority> they need to be civil and quiet and unobtrusive so straight, white, cis males will support them, and cites King, they’re either wildly misinformed of history or siding with the oppressor.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·29 days agoEven including black people MLK was factually overwhelmingly unpopular.
So instead of elaborating… you’re just going to meme? I mean sure go ahead, it just feels kinda, idk, pointless. ba-dum tss.
What do numbers mean anyways?
That’s what I’ve been repeatedly asking you.
Seems to mean that he wasn’t favorable at all.
Wait hangon, is this all because you’re interpreting positive approval of a contentious political figure from 1/3 of a population as not popular?
You realize that the figure includes black people right?
So… do… they not count?
The question is optics of the oppressor.
When someone tells <oppressed minority> they need to be civil and quiet and unobtrusive so straight, white, cis males will support them, and cites King, they’re either wildly misinformed of history or siding with the oppressor.
Even including black people MLK was factually overwhelmingly unpopular.
… Except with black people, right?