A. Art depicting figures that happen to be wearing regular clothing = sfw
B. Art depicting figures wearing clothing that intentionally accentuates the genitals = nsfw
Look through the nsfw posts in this community, look through the rest of my posts. Whether you’re satisfied or not isn’t my problem, I’m not posting for you.
I said the character had a visible bulge, thanks to their skimpy clothing. Thus its marked nsfw. A man with a bulging cock through his underwear would get the same mark.
Yeah, visibly trans people are nsfw, i guess. Children shouldn’t have to see that.
Flaunting your genitals is nsfw. Being trans has nothing to do with it.
So amab people should not be pictured wearing pants?
Are you being purposefully obtuse?
A. Art depicting figures that happen to be wearing regular clothing = sfw
B. Art depicting figures wearing clothing that intentionally accentuates the genitals = nsfw
The operative word is “intentionally”.
The art here is clearly ‘B’.
Yeah, no, trans people are inherently vulgar but cis men are fine. I get it.
Look back through the community and you’ll see that skimpy clothing and nudity are marked NSFW regardless of their gender.
Cool are you gonna retcon your reasoning to that?
Look through the nsfw posts in this community, look through the rest of my posts. Whether you’re satisfied or not isn’t my problem, I’m not posting for you.
It’s just that’s not what you said initially.
I said the character had a visible bulge, thanks to their skimpy clothing. Thus its marked nsfw. A man with a bulging cock through his underwear would get the same mark.