• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Most people agree poverty is bad, and less poverty is good. The real essense of the conversation is on what steps to take. Simply having a desire for an outcome doesn’t bring it about, but, say, using a Socialist economy to target poverty as something to be eliminated via key infrastructure development, job creation, and social services, as China has done, does.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People need effective, enforced, predictable laws that target infrastructure development, job creation, and social services.

      Americans are deeply indoctrinated against “socialism”.

      We’re better of calling any planned reform a regulated law bound economy with targets for equitable opportunities.

      The billionaires will hate it just as much, but the rest of the population might have an easier time considering it.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        My point is that what should happen in an ideal world doesn’t necessarily happen. We can’t get the DNC to transition to a Socialist platform, their donors are the bourgeoisie. Even if 90% of USians support Socialism, ie an economy where public ownership is the principle aspect, without siezure of the state and replacing with a proletarian-run state, such a re-orientation of the economy is impossible. The policy in bourgeois republics reflects the will and needs of Capital, and by extension the acolytes that worship it, the bourgeoisie.