Thank you for the patience and understanding. I love these kind of internet exchanges where opinion and ideas are exchanged and nobody is rude

Poopers

I now understand what they mean, but I stand by my coment because it does seem to blame bosses. It’s just a matter of wording

I think this is bit what the post is trying to say.

A few days ago, visa and MasterCard forced steam to stop selling some games they didn’t like, and is not the first time. For many of us (I’m not a bitcoiner nor a crypto bro, my entire crypto wallet is 1usd) the first thought was “this is ridiculous. They have a duopoly so they get to decide the rules of the internet. This can be solved with crypto to remove all the unnecessary middlemen”. I felt the push. It reignited my interest in the tech and am once again seeing what’s out there, fees, and transaction times looking for a good balance

I didn’t read it all. But I think we agree. The problem is owners. Not bosses. People who get to do nothing and still get paid

What do you think a boss does? They are also employees.

You are assuming that bosses do nothing. They add value. Not all of them, but in general they do. At my work place we pretty much begged my boss to please hire someone between him and us to manage tasks. Because my boss adds value Ina bunch of ways but he was so busy he could spare the time for the things we needed him so year long projects failed.

Its not the first time I’ve heard this, but I’m not sure I agree with this sentiment. The product I produce only has the value it has, because a lot of people work to make it so. And a huge part of that is managing costumers, understanding them prioritizing they requests and managing a team. If my workgets sold for 100 I would only be able to sell it at 50 because I do not have the costumer relationship

At the same time, I think the donations made him more money that I make in a year (I’m not from the us so I’d need to do a few conversions to make sure)

I’m not sure how I feel about this. Giving licenses to minors make no sense. But at the same time, bikes can sometimes be really fucking dangerous (for the rider. Everyone else is probably fine)

I said “if that were true then scubba divers would have the highest rate of cancer ever” and he failed to understand my point. Only then I realized that I was talking with someone unwilling to listen

The problem it that people don’t acknowledge their ignorance not because they didn’t realized it was an option, but because they think they know everything. And if you acknowledge your own ognorace in front of them, they take it to mean that they are superior and will mansplain everything

Once I said I do not know how cancer forms, my boss went off to tell me how it was because of the lack of oxygen so the mask we wore for covid was causing us all cancer. Fucking clown

I’m not saying you are wrong. But aren’t you reading too much into it? I find shows where the characters are always perfect to be boring and predictable

Also, I think that there is a clue that this opinions is biased: you can use the same shows to say the opposite “in these shows they always show the cops breaking the law. They are anti cop propaganda”

So the other server trusts what your account says? What is stopping you from sending fake likes?

I get that part. That sounds a of like the fediverse. But that cloning feature looks like you clone everything you do between many instances which is awesome, but I’m not sure how they could clone like counts. AFAIK they would either have to instruct the likers client to go like on the other instances, or trust the number reported by the OP

Thanks I’m interested on seeing how this handles things like likes

If he where to go to heaven. He would be unimpressed with the height

Can you link me to the feature? Or at least tell me the name so that I can look it up?

Yeah. I like the idea of separare WiFi. INE forma adults and another for kids

Yes. But honestly one of the main complains I’ve seen is not that this is wrong, but that they passed the law without having planned how they should do it while keeping the users safe and private.

Having a WiFi for kids and WiFi for adults could achieve the desired result without really compromising privacy (I think, but I’m not sure), or even enhancing it, since using Facebook on a kids WiFi would mean that Facebook thinks that you are a kids and KONWS they can’t legally track you

Also we could change some dumb rules on other like no posting nudity, since now if a user is using an adult WiFi, they should be treaded as adults. Want to post nudes on twitter? Sure, tag it as such and only adults will see them

In 5minutes on Lemmy we have come up with better ideas than the current law. They didn’t think about this nor heard the critics that have been saying this is a bad idea for years

But then again. What can we expect from people that trus t electronic voting

Edit: forgot this was about the UK. iDK if they have electronic voting