Going to school is not comparable to literal slavery

It’s going to suck to have to carry in depth genealogical records everywhere

deleted by creator

I think so. They keep saying the gunman meant to go to the NFL offices in the same building. With the source being “trust me bro”. Like they’ve released nothing.

I think the truth is this is a copycat killer going after the corporate elite and they want to hide that.

Somehow you turned something so lighthearted into something so pointlessly judgemental.

Like yeah we shouldn’t eat sugary cereals, and if it’s expensive a good alternative is to cut it out. This is just facts.

No need to go digging around their post history like that. It’s just kinda weird

Guess Americans can flee to Cuba

I would fully accept a law that allowed companies to advertise nationally the pre-tax price with a small disclaimer saying applicable taxes vary by location, and then require the in store price tags to reflect all taxes.

There’s no excuse not to anymore. Yes it does vary, and a computer can easily adjust the price.

In this case I understand not downsizing until your kids are established with a job/place to live.

Depending on equity and their mortgage payment it may not even be possible to downsize without paying more per month. That’s the insanity of the current market.

Remember this is an occupied family home with an unoccupied room. Not a whole property.

What would you suggest?

A lot of kids move back after college. I definitely wouldn’t downsize until my family was secure and for sure no longer needed the space.

Now the question is it better to allow that space sit vacant or rent out the space.

I think there is a defensible position for renting out a temporarily unused space in your primary home versus buying vacant properties solely to rent.

Sure you can argue they dont need that space, but a lot of kids return after college. If I had kids I’d only downsize once they are well established. It’s about ensuring the security of your family and ensuring they have a place to come back to.

Is it better to let that sit vacant for 4+ years though

deleted by creator

Not an apartment complex, but a building makes sense.

I’m not saying it’s just, but there are some loans that allow you to buy a quadplex but you have to live there. You are free to rent out the remaining units.

Exactly, I’d argue kids are the most likely to go to lengths to circumvent the rules

Forget tax havens, eventually some countries will probably become content havens and sell server space hosted there. Probably some carribean island

You could probably chop 1000 calories and handwash your bottoms more often

And that’s why our species will die in the muck after we drain this planet of everything it needs to support our lives

You could double everything in this post too and that’s only 60% consumption.

• 20 m² of personal living space + 20 m² for every 2 ppl as bathroom / kitchen
• 4200 kcal/day
• 2800 kWh/year, but this already includes public services (education/healthcare)
• 1 washing machine per 10 ppl
• 2.4 kg clothing / 6 months
• wear tops for 1.5 days and bottoms for 7.5 days without washing
• 1 laptop per 2 people with a yearly power consumption of 62 kWh. (bizzarely they talk about an 800 MHz computer and seem to confuse HDD and RAM). If your gaming computer used 400 W you could use it for 300 hr/year.

That seems a lot more reasonable to me and we still come in under carrying capacity

If you look at the numbers in your own post these laws are used very rarely, and in every state a fraction of petitions applied for are granted.

There needs to be actual evidence greater than “ex girlfriend said so” for a court to grant the request.

Ironically by the numbers Florida seems to be the state most likely to use the law. Granting a total of 2,355 in 2020. California on the other hand has issued only 984. These are the 3rd and 1st most populous states respectively.

Given how many people go through breakups each year and how many people are insanely petty, seems like it’s not just based on a disgruntled ex’s word.

My understanding is there is not a single state with red flag laws that allow all weapons to be seized based on one person’s word. Well other than a doctor giving a professional diagnosis.

For everyone else you have to have some evidence. Either multiple people witnessing threats/harassment video, or text based evidence.

And here I am going to get a MA in Archaeology lol.

It’ll work out hopefully. I have been gainfully employed in the field off of just my BA, but Trump has basically ruined that job