

Vibe soldiers? 🤔
Vibe soldiers? 🤔
I suppose i don’t see the point.
The reader knows what you censored either way, so by using the words and then censoring them you don’t achieve your implied preference for reducing vulgarity in communication (so it might be more impactful and irregular when applied) at all.
Anyone who reads “forking shut” knows what you are writing there in reality. Kinda feels to me like putting on censored porn to make it family friendly, that’s not working. Either watch a family movie, or some actual porn in private.
The only reasonable course of action would be to avoid vulgarity and those stand-ins for it completely in your communication.
Your instance does…
I was looking for a way to shoehorn american politics in here but couldn’t think of anything, thank you
I am curious, how is india and pakistan doing what they do best a cause for a global conflict? In the two last ones it was a bunch of european states tied together through silly treaties and pacts and a whole lot of countries coming together to stamp out the nazis, respectively.
India and pakistan are neighbors and essentially two sides of the same coin with different religions, and as far as i know have no defensive pacts with any major outside power. So even if they went to full blown war it would stay fairly confined to the region, no? Excluding considerations such as trade impact of course.
Understandable they are pissed. Paying in advance for games not yet made is a fucking scam, develop your shit and convince me with a finished, polished product.
I’m also sceptical of the bunch of promotional fluff in that link, that generally means less substance more bullshit in a game.
Complete brain damage in charge. It is one thing to suppress uncomfortable data not supporting your ideological narrative, but it is outright stupidity to not only not collect that data and keep it under wraps; but to destroy the data collection device you own and control.
Don’t be coy, you absolutely love doing this.
As a release version male i cant relate
spits chewing tobacco in a sexual tyrannosaurussy way
E: God dann i missed the other comment referencing that omega cringe line
Lets say i sell you one thing for 5 bucks. And i also want to sell you 100 of the things for 500 bucks. Are these the same deal to you? Why not? The savings are the same no?
But cant they also see my 8 minutes total time played?
I’m just saying, rich men can pick and choose from gorgeous women. Being physically attractive isn’t enough, those dynamics stop working when serious money and/or status is involved. They will choose women who have more going on for them than that, provided they are even okay with a transactional relationship. Rich marries rich.
And then, if you get “in” so to say, you definitely should expect to be reduced to the transactional nature of the relationship. He pays for everything, so you are expected to fulfill the role of a fuckmaid. Once you are no longer as attractive as the other 20somethings looking to land a rich husband he will likely cheat on you and/or just divorce you. With a prenup.
Can i be in the manifesto screenshot too dear feds
My client doesn’t show these things, and i’m honestly not interested enough in the matter to read someones bio to put their odd form of expression into context, even if it would show them.
For the sake of efficient communication i would suggest adjusting either by putting that context in your comment or by expressing yourself more clearly.
Who is “we” in this?
Kann mich nicht beklagen über die, letztes Jahr habe ich online einen monitor gekauft, welcher sich dann als curved entpuppt hat. Aufgebaut und ausprobiert hab ich ihn dann trotzdem.
2 Wochen später, einen Tag nach Ablauf der umtauschfrist, habe ich ihn dann zum MM gebracht. Wurde ohne murren angenommen, und der Berater hat mir noch einen normalen monitor mit den gleichen technischen daten rausgesucht und mitgegeben, hat mich nur die 10€ Preisdifferenz gekostet.
Ist das keine typische Kundenerfahrung?
… The formula is 1/2 your age + 7 tho.
So for that 27 year old dating a teenager it would certainly not be okay. 27/2=13.5+7 which i would generously round down to 20 years of appropriate minimum age.
This is glorious.
I mean, I’m not policing your words here, write how you want what do I care.
But you brought up the reasoning yourself, and when I find it flawed your response is “I don’t need a reason”.